scarletmbb
offline
offline
That makes sense. I like it. I'm intrigued to see the new daily training ideas they have.
CRich
offline
offline
No kidding. If 100 is still the max, then the changes make chemistry a non-issue. It would if they made chemistry have alot more of an impact on the game. Then it may make a team pay for a couple of games.
Modok
offline
offline
People seem to want to make chemistry a bigger part of the game. Its not a huge element in RL football. Yes it matters to a certain extent but not to the point some want it.
Prizzle
offline
offline
Originally posted by Modok
People seem to want to make chemistry a bigger part of the game. Its not a huge element in RL football. Yes it matters to a certain extent but not to the point some want it.
^ never played football
People seem to want to make chemistry a bigger part of the game. Its not a huge element in RL football. Yes it matters to a certain extent but not to the point some want it.
^ never played football
Modok
offline
offline
Originally posted by Prizzle
Originally posted by Modok
People seem to want to make chemistry a bigger part of the game. Its not a huge element in RL football. Yes it matters to a certain extent but not to the point some want it.
^ never played football
Oh yeah, all the changes the Patriots made last year really slowed them down.
Originally posted by Modok
People seem to want to make chemistry a bigger part of the game. Its not a huge element in RL football. Yes it matters to a certain extent but not to the point some want it.
^ never played football
Oh yeah, all the changes the Patriots made last year really slowed them down.
Prizzle
offline
offline
The additions or subtractions of the New England Patriots have absolutely nothing to do with me saying you have never played football
rdr3131
offline
offline
ex1 - If you have an OL that has played together the entire year That team is going to be better than the OL that has played together for 5 games. Maybe a few exceptions but I'll take the OL that has played together the entire year anyday.
ex2 - Lets take Romo and Owens(hate the damn cowboys) Look how long it took them to get going Owens' 1st year in dallas. Moss and Brady got going early but thats becuase Moss is a WR that you just hurl it up somewhere and Moss will find it. Also can't stand the Patriots.
ex2 - Lets take Romo and Owens(hate the damn cowboys) Look how long it took them to get going Owens' 1st year in dallas. Moss and Brady got going early but thats becuase Moss is a WR that you just hurl it up somewhere and Moss will find it. Also can't stand the Patriots.
Last edited May 28, 2008 18:13:14
Solo304
offline
offline
All I really want to know is how they intend to work the lvl cap for new team owners. That means I won't be able to take a couple of my guys to my new team when I get it?
rdr3131
offline
offline
Originally posted by Solo304
All I really want to know is how they intend to work the lvl cap for new team owners. That means I won't be able to take a couple of my guys to my new team when I get it?
I think that still in works, I think they are kinda looking at a way to do it but it may take a little Morale down or something along those lines
All I really want to know is how they intend to work the lvl cap for new team owners. That means I won't be able to take a couple of my guys to my new team when I get it?
I think that still in works, I think they are kinda looking at a way to do it but it may take a little Morale down or something along those lines
Modok
offline
offline
Originally posted by rdr3131
ex1 - If you have an OL that has played together the entire year That team is going to be better than the OL that has played together for 5 games. Maybe a few exceptions but I'll take the OL that has played together the entire year anyday.
ex2 - Lets take Romo and Owens(hate the damn cowboys) Look how long it took them to get going Owens' 1st year in dallas. Moss and Brady got going early but thats becuase Moss is a WR that you just hurl it up somewhere and Moss will find it. Also can't stand the Patriots.
Romo wasnt starting in TO's first year. His first start was week 8 and they actually have been lighting it up since. TO's struggles at the beginning of his Cowboy's career was due to Beldsoe's sorry ass.
I think chemistry USED to be a huge factor for teams but free agency has diminished that.
ex1 - If you have an OL that has played together the entire year That team is going to be better than the OL that has played together for 5 games. Maybe a few exceptions but I'll take the OL that has played together the entire year anyday.
ex2 - Lets take Romo and Owens(hate the damn cowboys) Look how long it took them to get going Owens' 1st year in dallas. Moss and Brady got going early but thats becuase Moss is a WR that you just hurl it up somewhere and Moss will find it. Also can't stand the Patriots.
Romo wasnt starting in TO's first year. His first start was week 8 and they actually have been lighting it up since. TO's struggles at the beginning of his Cowboy's career was due to Beldsoe's sorry ass.
I think chemistry USED to be a huge factor for teams but free agency has diminished that.
Chemistry is much more important in more exciting sports... like hockey! 
Just kidding, chemistry is important in all sports though. You don't have the same level of trust with players you're just thrown together with, than with people you have been playing with for years.
Just kidding, chemistry is important in all sports though. You don't have the same level of trust with players you're just thrown together with, than with people you have been playing with for years.You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
