Someone had to get it started, I suppose...
Captain Jack Riley
offline
offline
Originally posted by Vir
GG reavers! Thanks for taking pity on us in our first pro game
Haha, it wasn't Voluntary, y'all just played better than we did. Great win!
GG reavers! Thanks for taking pity on us in our first pro game
Haha, it wasn't Voluntary, y'all just played better than we did. Great win!
Buckeyes and Browns
offline
offline
Originally posted by reginator
GG St. Marys...you completely shut down our offense
GG - nice job holding us to all those freakin' FGs.
GG St. Marys...you completely shut down our offense
GG - nice job holding us to all those freakin' FGs.
Edited by LAOKS MAN on Jun 21, 2009 19:16:42
eZe471
offline
offline
GG Gangsters. I'm sure that we would have lost regardless but is 10 FF something that happens a lot in the Pros? I don't think I've ever seen that many and I honestly think that is a bunch of crap................
CinTex
offline
offline
Great Game Frenzy....
HB Demarcus Tribble 8/202.5 & 4TDs.....
WOW!!!... mad respect... [bows]....
I bet we had you worried in the 3rd though
and BTW.... FUCK YOU 5Star!!!!... UT owns the Buckeyes and always will... and there's nothing you can do about it.... kindly "Toss my Salad" you Troll....
Florida it may not be this season but I will enthusiastically await out next match-up... you guys Rock!!!!
HB Demarcus Tribble 8/202.5 & 4TDs.....
WOW!!!... mad respect... [bows]....
I bet we had you worried in the 3rd though
and BTW.... FUCK YOU 5Star!!!!... UT owns the Buckeyes and always will... and there's nothing you can do about it.... kindly "Toss my Salad" you Troll....
Florida it may not be this season but I will enthusiastically await out next match-up... you guys Rock!!!!
jdros13
offline
offline
GG Guam? Still looking forward to when you guys take this league by storm. I know it is coming soon.
McGruffHawk
offline
offline
Originally posted by eZe471
GG Gangsters. I'm sure that we would have lost regardless but is 10 FF something that happens a lot in the Pros? I don't think I've ever seen that many and I honestly think that is a bunch of crap................
GG regardless. Another team I OC for was victimized by 5 turnovers today, so I feel your pain.
And LOL to all those "predictors" who slept on Cascade today.
GG Gangsters. I'm sure that we would have lost regardless but is 10 FF something that happens a lot in the Pros? I don't think I've ever seen that many and I honestly think that is a bunch of crap................
GG regardless. Another team I OC for was victimized by 5 turnovers today, so I feel your pain.
And LOL to all those "predictors" who slept on Cascade today.
MrMoose
offline
offline
Originally posted by eZe471
GG Gangsters. I'm sure that we would have lost regardless but is 10 FF something that happens a lot in the Pros? I don't think I've ever seen that many and I honestly think that is a bunch of crap................
What is the carrying on the guys we forced the fumbles on? If it is low, that's your answer. I'm not one to normally say "builds lol" but I can guarantee you that we have guys well-suited to force fumbles against players with low carrying
GG Gangsters. I'm sure that we would have lost regardless but is 10 FF something that happens a lot in the Pros? I don't think I've ever seen that many and I honestly think that is a bunch of crap................
What is the carrying on the guys we forced the fumbles on? If it is low, that's your answer. I'm not one to normally say "builds lol" but I can guarantee you that we have guys well-suited to force fumbles against players with low carrying
SCACE
offline
offline
Originally posted by MrMoose
Originally posted by eZe471
GG Gangsters. I'm sure that we would have lost regardless but is 10 FF something that happens a lot in the Pros? I don't think I've ever seen that many and I honestly think that is a bunch of crap................
What is the carrying on the guys we forced the fumbles on? If it is low, that's your answer. I'm not one to normally say "builds lol" but I can guarantee you that we have guys well-suited to force fumbles against players with low carrying
Don't forget the confidence/morale spiral...once a fumble party starts, its hard to stop unless you do some really great things on offense AND/OR you have the confidence/morale to handle it.
Originally posted by eZe471
GG Gangsters. I'm sure that we would have lost regardless but is 10 FF something that happens a lot in the Pros? I don't think I've ever seen that many and I honestly think that is a bunch of crap................
What is the carrying on the guys we forced the fumbles on? If it is low, that's your answer. I'm not one to normally say "builds lol" but I can guarantee you that we have guys well-suited to force fumbles against players with low carrying
Don't forget the confidence/morale spiral...once a fumble party starts, its hard to stop unless you do some really great things on offense AND/OR you have the confidence/morale to handle it.
ptriley
offline
offline
Originally posted by eZe471
GG Gangsters. I'm sure that we would have lost regardless but is 10 FF something that happens a lot in the Pros? I don't think I've ever seen that many and I honestly think that is a bunch of crap................
build better ball carriers....we did, and we built Defensive guys to do just that,,,GG
GG Gangsters. I'm sure that we would have lost regardless but is 10 FF something that happens a lot in the Pros? I don't think I've ever seen that many and I honestly think that is a bunch of crap................
build better ball carriers....we did, and we built Defensive guys to do just that,,,GG
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
