Ok, so let's see them. And you guys thought they were out already 
hobbock
offline
offline
Originally posted by lawdog
Ok, so let's see them. And you guys thought they were out already
Curse you, fiend!
Ok, so let's see them. And you guys thought they were out already
Curse you, fiend!
geauxgirl
offline
offline
I think the Bayou Benagls should jump a few points too simply because we carry the most swagger.. and we have played only about 9 teams that we were totally out-matched!!!
gg
ggLast edited May 21, 2008 14:43:31
Rod Long
offline
offline
Originally posted by geauxgirl
I think the Bayou Benagls should jump a few points too simply because we carry the most swagger.. and we have played only about 9 teams that we were totally out-matched!!!
gg
Babe I didn't say that you carried a lot of swagger, just that you shouldn't wear THOSE jeans!
I think the Bayou Benagls should jump a few points too simply because we carry the most swagger.. and we have played only about 9 teams that we were totally out-matched!!!
ggBabe I didn't say that you carried a lot of swagger, just that you shouldn't wear THOSE jeans!
Bdubb
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rod Long
predicting Hammmond continues to be overranked by 4 spots min
Don't hate.
predicting Hammmond continues to be overranked by 4 spots min
Don't hate.
Rod Long
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bdubb
Originally posted by Rod Long
predicting Hammmond continues to be overranked by 4 spots min
Don't hate.
Just based upon number of losses and who those teams were, bro. No disrespect to your team proper.
Originally posted by Rod Long
predicting Hammmond continues to be overranked by 4 spots min
Don't hate.
Just based upon number of losses and who those teams were, bro. No disrespect to your team proper.
jfbueno
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rod Long
Originally posted by Bdubb
Originally posted by Rod Long
predicting Hammmond continues to be overranked by 4 spots min
Don't hate.
Just based upon number of losses and who those teams were, bro. No disrespect to your team proper.
But they beat us and that more then makes up for those losses.
Originally posted by Bdubb
Originally posted by Rod Long
predicting Hammmond continues to be overranked by 4 spots min
Don't hate.
Just based upon number of losses and who those teams were, bro. No disrespect to your team proper.
But they beat us and that more then makes up for those losses.
Jericoholic
offline
offline
Originally posted by Eli Blanton
...but whatever you do, don't put the LUEs ahead of the Hangovers!!!!
Hanging with Hammond for 4 quarters is much more impressive than stomping the Storm >_>
...but whatever you do, don't put the LUEs ahead of the Hangovers!!!!
Hanging with Hammond for 4 quarters is much more impressive than stomping the Storm >_>
lawdog
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rod Long
Originally posted by Bdubb
Originally posted by Rod Long
predicting Hammmond continues to be overranked by 4 spots min
Don't hate.
Just based upon number of losses and who those teams were, bro. No disrespect to your team proper.
And look at who we beat. Yeah, we lost to the Pewnts, not a bad loss.
Originally posted by Bdubb
Originally posted by Rod Long
predicting Hammmond continues to be overranked by 4 spots min
Don't hate.
Just based upon number of losses and who those teams were, bro. No disrespect to your team proper.
And look at who we beat. Yeah, we lost to the Pewnts, not a bad loss.
Rod Long
offline
offline
Originally posted by jfbueno
Originally posted by Rod Long
Originally posted by Bdubb
Originally posted by Rod Long
predicting Hammmond continues to be overranked by 4 spots min
Don't hate.
Just based upon number of losses and who those teams were, bro. No disrespect to your team proper.
But they beat us and that more then makes up for those losses.
Hammond has 2 losses.
Monkeys lost to a team with 2 losses.
Sharks lost to an undefeated team.
Hell, I've got a copy of the code for a Colley-Matrix to run for the league, but I'm not computer savvy enough to implement it. It would clean up a lot of the petty arguments about the power rankings.
But Bears' p-rankings are still a fun time!
Originally posted by Rod Long
Originally posted by Bdubb
Originally posted by Rod Long
predicting Hammmond continues to be overranked by 4 spots min
Don't hate.
Just based upon number of losses and who those teams were, bro. No disrespect to your team proper.
But they beat us and that more then makes up for those losses.
Hammond has 2 losses.
Monkeys lost to a team with 2 losses.
Sharks lost to an undefeated team.
Hell, I've got a copy of the code for a Colley-Matrix to run for the league, but I'm not computer savvy enough to implement it. It would clean up a lot of the petty arguments about the power rankings.
But Bears' p-rankings are still a fun time!
Last edited May 21, 2008 19:50:35
lawdog
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rod Long
Hammond has 2 losses.
Monkeys lost to a team with 2 losses.
Sharks lost to an undefeated team.
Hell, I've got a copy of the code for a Colley-Matrix to run for the league, but I'm not computer savvy enough to implement it. It would clean up a lot of the petty arguments about the power rankings.
But Bears' p-rankings are still a fun time!
It will all be settled on the field. I enjoy the power rankings.
Hammond has 2 losses.
Monkeys lost to a team with 2 losses.
Sharks lost to an undefeated team.
Hell, I've got a copy of the code for a Colley-Matrix to run for the league, but I'm not computer savvy enough to implement it. It would clean up a lot of the petty arguments about the power rankings.
But Bears' p-rankings are still a fun time!
It will all be settled on the field. I enjoy the power rankings.
pulse
offline
offline
or we could just setup an excel spreadsheet to run RPI+ calculations... not quite hte same as power rankings, but simple enough.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
