Warrior General Games

Naga - Naga proved to be a stronger conference by winning the inter-league matches 10-6 with Burma taking the upset of the week vs then #4 Lea Lea.

Garuda - The only question is who will stop the Dragons win streak? Their toughest stretch starts in week 8, against 4 strong opponents.


1) Komodo Dragon (LW - 1) W 69-10 vs prev #6 Bacolod Cobras

2) Phnom Penh Samurai (LW - 2) W 29-26 vs The Manila Guerrillas

3) Sumatra Sting (LW - 3) W 90-6 vs Garut Fire Horses

4) Michiana Grizzlies (LW - 5) W 34-27 vs New Jersey Beaver Hunters

5) Seoul Snatchers (LW - 8) W 19-10 vs Laos Chaos

6) Burma Black Dragons (LW - NR) W 31-29 vs prev #4 Lea Lea Furniture

7) Lea Lea Furniture (LW -4) L 29-31 vs Burma Black Dragons

8) Hell Valley Snow Monkeys (LW - 10) W 26-3 vs Taipei Yonghe soybean milk

9) Tibetan Drunk Monks (LW - NR) W 13-6 vs prev #7 Malaysia Marauders

10) Arctic Avalanche (LW - NR) W 37-27 vs Manila Pack

Still laughable.

Well I don't see anyone else doing it. How would you rank the top 10?

Someone try ranking top to bottom? I may....

Originally posted by fletch03
Still laughable.

are you just mad because you guys lost in the first round last season?

Originally posted by ahalve01
Well I don't see anyone else doing it. How would you rank the top 10?

Well the frogs still aren't in the top 10. Especially after they beat a team by 80+ in the scrimmages that is ranked in the top 10.

A couple of the new teams are good, but top 2? I'd put one in the top 5 (somewhere around 4-5) and the other would be top 10 (especially since one of them scraped by with a 60+ FG).

Oh and the sting should be #1. Still the best team in the league even though they choked in the playoffs last season.



Maybe after the next games I'll rank them. Too early to tell for sure right now, but going off of common sense tells me these rankings are just as laughable as the preseason rankings.

And no, I am not mad about last season. It happens.

Originally posted by ahalve01
Well I don't see anyone else doing it. How would you rank the top 10?

I always deliver!

Power Rankings posted in the Forum

Originally posted by fletch03
Originally posted by ahalve01

Well I don't see anyone else doing it. How would you rank the top 10?

Well the frogs still aren't in the top 10. Especially after they beat a team by 80+ in the scrimmages that is ranked in the top 10.

A couple of the new teams are good, but top 2? I'd put one in the top 5 (somewhere around 4-5) and the other would be top 10 (especially since one of them scraped by with a 60+ FG).

Oh and the sting should be #1. Still the best team in the league even though they choked in the playoffs last season.



Maybe after the next games I'll rank them. Too early to tell for sure right now, but going off of common sense tells me these rankings are just as laughable as the preseason rankings.

And no, I am not mad about last season. It happens.

No Worries about the lack of respect, we only beat the preseason #9 team by 144 points. I think we'd see the Frogs in the rankings if we would have won by 145.

Originally posted by fletch03
Originally posted by ahalve01

Well I don't see anyone else doing it. How would you rank the top 10?

Well the frogs still aren't in the top 10. Especially after they beat a team by 80+ in the scrimmages that is ranked in the top 10.

A couple of the new teams are good, but top 2? I'd put one in the top 5 (somewhere around 4-5) and the other would be top 10 (especially since one of them scraped by with a 60+ FG).

Oh and the sting should be #1. Still the best team in the league even though they choked in the playoffs last season.



Maybe after the next games I'll rank them. Too early to tell for sure right now, but going off of common sense tells me these rankings are just as laughable as the preseason rankings.

And no, I am not mad about last season. It happens.

I remember reading in one of these forums that the preseason scrims don't matter because not many GP for them!

What about the first game the Frogs played?

You are right they don't matter. But when it is all we have to go off of as far as rankings goes, then it does.

Common sense tells me that a team that loses by 144 in the preseason isn't very good. Even if they didn't game plan they are still not very good.

In the end it is your opinion. Just trying to help you out a little so you at least have a little credibility.

Sure I put them the drifters in, I based it on what I had to go by which was what they did last season. That's what I said in the preseason rankings. I didn't go by the scrimmages. I didn't really look at the team roster. I should have, but didn't.
The frogs basically beat a CPU team, do you guys really believe a team should be put in the rankings for beating a team like that? Frogs would have been in had it been a win over a more complete team.

Keep the Frogs out of the rankings. I like the motivation

Originally posted by tripr6
Sure I put them the drifters in, I based it on what I had to go by which was what they did last season. That's what I said in the preseason rankings. I didn't go by the scrimmages. I didn't really look at the team roster. I should have, but didn't.
The frogs basically beat a CPU team, do you guys really believe a team should be put in the rankings for beating a team like that? Frogs would have been in had it been a win over a more complete team.




Then how come you didn't look at what the frogs did last season?

Fletch it's been determined that his guy is just jealous because the teams that was here last season will rock them and now they just moved up and want to think they own god himself.... well when sting rolls into town there and beats their ass all over the field.... we'll see what happens to these so called "rankings"