thoughts on the game?
Jabber40
offline
offline
My first thought was that PHP was going to beat the Marvins like a bunch of red-headed step-children, but then I started looking closer. The Marvins top player threats are all Lvl40-45, the PHP top player threats are all Lvl33-34. If you look at the scores of games against common opponents(there were 7 of them), Marvins averaged a score of 59-20 while PHP averaged a score of 86-15. That stat is misleading though as the Marvins did better than the PHP in 4 of those games and 3 of the 4 opponents had winning records and a combined record of 24-16. In the 3 games where PHP did better than the Marvins, the opponents had a combined record of 5-25.
Basically, PHP has the potential to be more explosive, but they haven't shown that against quality opponents. I'm rooting for PHP, but I think Marvins win it 34-22.
Basically, PHP has the potential to be more explosive, but they haven't shown that against quality opponents. I'm rooting for PHP, but I think Marvins win it 34-22.
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jabber40
My first thought was that PHP was going to beat the Marvins like a bunch of red-headed step-children, but then I started looking closer. The Marvins top player threats are all Lvl40-45, the PHP top player threats are all Lvl33-34. If you look at the scores of games against common opponents(there were 7 of them), Marvins averaged a score of 59-20 while PHP averaged a score of 86-15. That stat is misleading though as the Marvins did better than the PHP in 4 of those games and 3 of the 4 opponents had winning records and a combined record of 24-16. In the 3 games where PHP did better than the Marvins, the opponents had a combined record of 5-25.
Basically, PHP has the potential to be more explosive, but they haven't shown that against quality opponents. I'm rooting for PHP, but I think Marvins win it 34-22.
wow I love the unbiased prediction from a member of PHP, thanks man. I am making sure my AI is set so I don't get burned like I did against sahara. The right defensive formation and that TD probably would not have happened
My first thought was that PHP was going to beat the Marvins like a bunch of red-headed step-children, but then I started looking closer. The Marvins top player threats are all Lvl40-45, the PHP top player threats are all Lvl33-34. If you look at the scores of games against common opponents(there were 7 of them), Marvins averaged a score of 59-20 while PHP averaged a score of 86-15. That stat is misleading though as the Marvins did better than the PHP in 4 of those games and 3 of the 4 opponents had winning records and a combined record of 24-16. In the 3 games where PHP did better than the Marvins, the opponents had a combined record of 5-25.
Basically, PHP has the potential to be more explosive, but they haven't shown that against quality opponents. I'm rooting for PHP, but I think Marvins win it 34-22.
wow I love the unbiased prediction from a member of PHP, thanks man. I am making sure my AI is set so I don't get burned like I did against sahara. The right defensive formation and that TD probably would not have happened
palmer_garnett_95
offline
offline
Originally posted by Robbnva
Originally posted by Jabber40
My first thought was that PHP was going to beat the Marvins like a bunch of red-headed step-children, but then I started looking closer. The Marvins top player threats are all Lvl40-45, the PHP top player threats are all Lvl33-34. If you look at the scores of games against common opponents(there were 7 of them), Marvins averaged a score of 59-20 while PHP averaged a score of 86-15. That stat is misleading though as the Marvins did better than the PHP in 4 of those games and 3 of the 4 opponents had winning records and a combined record of 24-16. In the 3 games where PHP did better than the Marvins, the opponents had a combined record of 5-25.
Basically, PHP has the potential to be more explosive, but they haven't shown that against quality opponents. I'm rooting for PHP, but I think Marvins win it 34-22.
wow I love the unbiased prediction from a member of PHP, thanks man. I am making sure my AI is set so I don't get burned like I did against sahara. The right defensive formation and that TD probably would not have happened
Except we're talking about Hulk Blazing, and you just can't stop him.
Here's what I'm going by:
MSM played Seychelles closer, so I think MSM should be favored. However, PHP is dangerous and we'll have to see if Robb can stop some of the things that PHP does well.
Originally posted by Jabber40
My first thought was that PHP was going to beat the Marvins like a bunch of red-headed step-children, but then I started looking closer. The Marvins top player threats are all Lvl40-45, the PHP top player threats are all Lvl33-34. If you look at the scores of games against common opponents(there were 7 of them), Marvins averaged a score of 59-20 while PHP averaged a score of 86-15. That stat is misleading though as the Marvins did better than the PHP in 4 of those games and 3 of the 4 opponents had winning records and a combined record of 24-16. In the 3 games where PHP did better than the Marvins, the opponents had a combined record of 5-25.
Basically, PHP has the potential to be more explosive, but they haven't shown that against quality opponents. I'm rooting for PHP, but I think Marvins win it 34-22.
wow I love the unbiased prediction from a member of PHP, thanks man. I am making sure my AI is set so I don't get burned like I did against sahara. The right defensive formation and that TD probably would not have happened
Except we're talking about Hulk Blazing, and you just can't stop him.
Here's what I'm going by:
MSM played Seychelles closer, so I think MSM should be favored. However, PHP is dangerous and we'll have to see if Robb can stop some of the things that PHP does well.
Robbnva
offline
offline
Hulk blazing was hulk meh when he played us. he had a lucky TD because of a ballsy call and because my defense for in the red-zone was not right.
Jabber40
offline
offline
I'll let you in on a secret to help you with your AI. We plan on running QB Sneaks all game to control the ball, run down the clock, and keep your offense off the field. If you set your defense focus on stopping the QB Sneak, we're screwed. 
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jabber40
I'll let you in on a secret to help you with your AI. We plan on running QB Sneaks all game to control the ball, run down the clock, and keep your offense off the field. If you set your defense focus on stopping the QB Sneak, we're screwed.
SWEET!!! thanks for that
I'll let you in on a secret to help you with your AI. We plan on running QB Sneaks all game to control the ball, run down the clock, and keep your offense off the field. If you set your defense focus on stopping the QB Sneak, we're screwed.
SWEET!!! thanks for that
jdawg011
offline
offline
Game of the week here, thats for sure
Im going with MSM. Sea Wolves need some breathing room since a slip up is possible with those pesky beavers up next
Im going with MSM. Sea Wolves need some breathing room since a slip up is possible with those pesky beavers up next
Last edited Jan 22, 2009 09:54:17
jdawg011
offline
offline
no, they are a good team who have always given us trouble. we underestimated them last season, it wont happen again
Ben Sanderson
offline
offline
Originally posted by Robbnva
Hulk blazing was hulk meh when he played us. he had a lucky TD because of a ballsy call and because my defense for in the red-zone was not right.
Hulk meh?
Hmmm... over 15 catches 100+ yds. 3 TD including the Game winner. Meh, guess he doesn't matter. You're right. You should stop paying attention to him.
Hulk blazing was hulk meh when he played us. he had a lucky TD because of a ballsy call and because my defense for in the red-zone was not right.
Hulk meh?
Hmmm... over 15 catches 100+ yds. 3 TD including the Game winner. Meh, guess he doesn't matter. You're right. You should stop paying attention to him.
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ben Sanderson
Originally posted by Robbnva
Hulk blazing was hulk meh when he played us. he had a lucky TD because of a ballsy call and because my defense for in the red-zone was not right.
Hulk meh?
Hmmm... over 15 catches 100+ yds. 3 TD including the Game winner. Meh, guess he doesn't matter. You're right. You should stop paying attention to him.
but that production is LOW for him
Originally posted by Robbnva
Hulk blazing was hulk meh when he played us. he had a lucky TD because of a ballsy call and because my defense for in the red-zone was not right.
Hulk meh?
Hmmm... over 15 catches 100+ yds. 3 TD including the Game winner. Meh, guess he doesn't matter. You're right. You should stop paying attention to him.
but that production is LOW for him
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
