Warrior General Games

Rankings are derived by stats from passing yards, passing TDs, Ints thrown, sacks allowed, passing yards allowed, passing TDs allowed, rushing yards, rushing TDs, fumbles, rushing yards allowed, rushing TDs allowed, KR average, and PR average.

A point is subtracted from overall score for each win and also 1 point is taken away if the team won that week.

Eastern Conference

1 Windsor Warhammers .......... 0.077
2 Toronto Thunder .......... 0.154
3 Black River Rats .......... 1.385
4 Nova Scotia Lions .......... 1.462
5* College 6 Year Plan .......... 1.923
5* Thunder Bay Marauders .......... 1.923
6 Thunder Bay Hitmen .......... 3.538
7 Ottawa Storm Troopers .......... 3.692
8 St. Catharines Stompers .......... 4.000
9 Napa Storm .......... 4.769
10 Mighty Moncton Nighthawks .......... 7.077
11 Great Lakes Rum Runners .......... 7.308
12 Port Dover Panthers .......... 7.692
13 Yukon Effyourself .......... 7.923
14 Quebec Eagles .......... 9.769
15 Guelph Cows CPU .......... 12.308

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Western Conference

1 Cincinnati Cardinals .......... 0.385
2 Alberta Irukandji .......... 0.615
3* North Bay Drift .......... 1.692
3* Manitoba Lions .......... 1.692
4 Manitoba Maulers .......... 1.923
5 Vancouver Vikings .......... 2.000
6 Fhockey.com Demos .......... 2.077
7 Canada Dragons .......... 2.385
8 Moose Jaw Roughriders .......... 3.154
9 Edmonton Thunderchiefs .......... 5.462
10 Victoria Fish .......... 5.923
11 Rancho Penasquitos Thunderbolts .......... 6.538
12 Laval Crusaders .......... 6.692
13 Arroz Con Pollo .......... 6.846
14 Fort McMurray Mounted Police .......... 8.077
15 Saskatchewan Thrashers .......... 12.462

* denotes tie

It's only the second week but teams look to be shuffling into proper order. Still plenty of time for surprises.

Games of the Week

East (best combined Bender ranking)
Toronto Thunder vs Thunder Bay Marauders (2.077)

predicted score: Toronto over Thunder Bay 42-32

West (best combined Bender ranking)
Fhockey.com Demos vs Cincinnati Cardinals (2.462)

predicted score: Cincinnati Cardinals over Fhockey.com 46-38

Last Week's Predictions: 2-0
On the Year: 2-0

(predicted scores are taken from the League Projector Rankings Spreadsheet)

(edit: a user error caused KR/PR numbers not to be factored in, rankings have been adjusted)

Thanks Bender!

Sorry guys, I don't do spiffy write ups about each team lol

I don't need spiffy write-ups.... I mean, they help but...

Nah. What is nice right now is that we are getting a mix of different standings and write-ups. I like the predictions and such. Am the only one who doesn't know how the numbers are derived though?

I go through each of the categories and rank each team's position 1-16 (or less if there's a tie). I put a little bigger penalty on stats that hurt teams, like sacks, Ints, fumbles, TDs allowed, and use the actual number of those instead of the team's rank (that's why those 17 sacks hurt 6YP the first week). Those numbers are averaged and then total wins are subtracted and 1 point subtracted if the team won that week.

Come on it's very simple, follow along man

Originally posted by wooden_bender
I go through each of the categories and rank each team's position 1-16 (or less if there's a tie). I put a little bigger penalty on stats that hurt teams, like sacks, Ints, fumbles, TDs allowed, and use the actual number of those instead of the team's rank (that's why those 17 sacks hurt 6YP the first week). Those numbers are averaged and then total wins are subtracted and 1 point subtracted if the team won that week.

Come on it's very simple, follow along man

That isn't too complicated but it seems a little simplistic.

It might be nice to set up a sheet that values each of those 'events' and then assigns them to 'teams' . Each team has Rush/Pass D rating and O ratings, etc- much like the match-up.

But I guess that is better for comparison than over-all standings.

For a game that is basically a GIANT database, detailed stats are amazingly hard to get....

That's too much trouble man, lol

It is simplistic, I'm a simple person. The only thing I wish I could add was some sort of value for quality of opponent, but I still haven't found a good way to do that.

edit: I just thought of something, might add it in next ranking and see how it changes things.

Thx bender ..this is what we like to see.

Keep movin' up Fish...

without game planning lol

Thanx I like these

Sweet, thanks man

Originally posted by Absolut Zero
Sweet, thanks man

quit sucking up, you got your equpiment lol

Originally posted by wooden_bender
Originally posted by Absolut Zero

Sweet, thanks man

quit sucking up, you got your equpiment lol

Wha? ...ME?!? Nonsense.

The Maulers were wronged I tell you, wronged by that adjustment....

I'm looking forward to seeing the Lions vs. Vikings game tomorrow.

Originally posted by bluemagus
The Maulers were wronged I tell you, wronged by that adjustment....

I'm looking forward to seeing the Lions vs. Vikings game tomorrow.

that's what you get for calling my rankings simplistic lol