User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > USA A Leagues > USA A #3 > USA A #3 | Week 5 Power Rankings
Page:
 
sully
offline
Link
 
I think in another game or so, we'll be able to give these rankings a little more credibility. As I mentioned before, we need a bit more time for the contending teams to play the squads that have no business being in this league, as they tend to skew the rankings one way or another. They will get sorted out, but they are starting to at least somewhat take shape.

Week 5 | A-3 Power Rankings
1] Coruscant Death Stars (3-2), 8.31
2] Portland Aftershocks (3-2), 7.45
3] Birmingham Beavers (5-0), 7.22
4] Minnesota Lumberjacks (3-2), 6.62
5] D.C. Corruption (5-0), 5.93
6] Fort Richardson Redskins (5-0), 5.48
7] Cleveland Gladiators (5-0), 4.87
8] Austin Orangebloods (4-1), 4.36
9] Kansas Twisters (3-2), 3.70
10] Omaha BA Mofo's (4-1), 3.65
11] College Station Stallions (2-3), 3.63
12] Jersey Shore Hammerheads (2-3), 3.50
13] Indianapolis Inferno (3-2), 3.16
14] New York Nightmare (3-2), 2.37
15] Cincinnati Stoners (3-2), 2.25
16] Las Vegas Aces (3-2), 2.04
17] Panthers Syndicate (3-2), 1.71
18] Dirty South Brew Crew (2-3), 1.50
19] El Paso Executioners (3-2), 1.46
20] Middle Tennessee Fightin' Catfish (3-2), 0.74
21] Virginia Hustlers (2-3), 0.23
22] Gotham City Punishers (3-2), 0.10
23] Tricity Cardinals (3-2), -0.05
24] East Brewton Warbirds (1-4), -1.65
25] Miami Brawlers (2-3), -1.76
26] Sacramento South Side Psychos (1-4), -2.17
27] Mississippi Rebels (0-5), -4.44
28] Heavenly Angels (0-5), -5.48
29] College Station Aggies (1-4), -6.22
30] Shelby Bearcats (0-5), -8.76
31] South Bend Red Raiders (0-5), -13.19
32] Las Vegas Gamblers (0-5), -17.37
 
Ephraim
offline
Link
 
Thanks sully.

Yeah, hopefully they'll get balanced out here in a game or two.
 
sully
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ephraim
Thanks sully.

Yeah, hopefully they'll get balanced out here in a game or two.


...Not that I mind seeing 4 teams promoted from the BBB occupying the top spots or anything
 
TheZaba
offline
Link
 
I guess we need to start running up the score?
 
Ephraim
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by sully
Originally posted by Ephraim

Thanks sully.

Yeah, hopefully they'll get balanced out here in a game or two.


...Not that I mind seeing 4 teams promoted from the BBB occupying the top spots or anything


Yeah, I bet you don't. Which leads me to say.............................RIGGED!
 
sully
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TheZaba
I guess we need to start running up the score?


Not quite. Like I mentioned, the crap teams need to play more of the non-crap teams so the rankings can even out a bit. For example, the Lumberjacks are higher than they probably should be, as they started off with two teams that would struggle to win games in BBB, let alone A.

Gotham City, on the other hand, is probably better than advertised as they have had all of their tough opponents right off the bat.
 
HSKRCHMPS
offline
Link
 
Wins/losses affect the standings too, correct. I don't think they were counted in last season's rankings
 
sully
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by HSKRCHMPS
Wins/losses affect the standings too, correct. I don't think they were counted in last season's rankings


Yes, wins and losses are a part of the overall ranking.
 
ShakeNBake
offline
Link
 
I really only see 1 mistake....



Some dumbass put 14 teams above the Stoners

Must be a typo
 
Ephraim
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ShakeNBake
I really only see 1 mistake....



Some dumbass put 14 teams above the Stoners

Must be a typo


Oh really? I thought there was supposed to be 31 teams above you.
 
ShakeNBake
offline
Link
 
Gimme some of what you're smokin!
 
Ephraim
offline
Link
 
Where you at? All the stuff in town now is some alright stuff.
 
sully
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ShakeNBake
I really only see 1 mistake....



Some dumbass put 14 teams above the Stoners

Must be a typo


You're right.

There are supposed to be 31 teams above them.
 
Ephraim
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by sully
Originally posted by ShakeNBake

I really only see 1 mistake....



Some dumbass put 14 teams above the Stoners

Must be a typo


You're right.

There are supposed to be 31 teams above them.


I'm glad that at least one person agrees with me.
 
n:iceman:16
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by sully
For example, the Lumberjacks are higher than they probably should be


Higher than 32 = higher than they should be.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.