Warrior General Games

Hey guys - blew some time plugging WE-AA#1 into the League Projector from the Forums - obviously common sense tells you that some of these aren't quite right, so take them for entertainment value only:

Alpha:

Newcastle R 464 Pitt 24
Eurotrash 24 Whitechapel 24
West Country 31 Rome 28
Donegal 107 Southhampton 51
Coventry 893 Amargh 6
Oslo 49 Massillon 18
PGL 231 Amsterdam 23
Whitechurch 70 Rockledge 10

Zeta:

Brighton 54 Dallas 30 (like I said...)
Tilburg 130 Chesham 8
Dungannon 125 Newcastle NB 9
Helsinki 31 Stockholm 30
Dublin 34 Judah 17
Bushy Park 255 Portland 0
Schiffertown 56 Richmond 16
Rotterdam 185 Paris 8

GL in the real games everyone

I don't see us beating/tieing Eurothrash, but thank the League Projector for thinking so .

Originally posted by Luke Pass
I don't see us beating/tieing Eurothrash, but thank the League Projector for thinking so .

I want to see Coventry try and score 893 points -- that would be a little more than 2 TDs per minute -- if chess has the Deep Blue supercomputer, this must be someone's old Commadore Vic-20

Too bad scores are capped at like 255 or something like that.

Giving the Hammers the edge over Stockholm is a reach. I hope we can pull off the upset, but I will be surprised if we do.

This game is a fucking joke, 3 int's brought back to the house by Eurothrash. Obviously the TO's killed our team, but this game is getting to the point where it is not even close to realistic. You can obviously see our frustration. Nothing against Euro, you guys have a great team, nice game and good luck as you move forward.

Our QB had 2 int's the first 4 games and now 5 in this game, wow!!!

I know some people say it's all in the builds and planning but it can be annoying. Our QB had 2 INTs in 6 games (4 of which were against good squads) and then threw 3 INTs in our game against Donegal. I suppose you could compare it to a QB having a bad day in real life but I wish there was more structure to this game sometimes.

Building your players throughout a season to meet changes made in the game, just to have more changes made to the position builds the next season sucks as a way to run a business.

The rate of interceptions that go for touchdowns is a big problem... I'm not sure exactly how to go about fixing it, but right now it's gotta be at least half of all picks that go for 6, which isn't anywhere near realistic. Not that I should be complaining, the way that that stat's favored us so far this season

Most fumbles that aren't recovered in a pileup (and some that are) seem to go all the way too.

I agree. Last year we had a corner pick off ten and 7 went for 6.

I think about the only way to fix it is with special coding. Something like the odds of picking up a fumble and attempting to run equals 2% for NT/DT, 5% for DE, 7% for LB/SS/FS and 15% for CB's. (We all know CB's have the biggest egos)

To stop the Pick six the offensive line should gravitate laterialy towards the direction the ball was thrown. The big problem though is the difference in speed between a CB and a lineman. In "real" football even that 330 pound OT runs about a five second or less 40...

i have thrown 39 TDs this year for 2 Interceptions.

Originally posted by Daniel NIlsson
i have thrown 39 TDs this year for 2 Interceptions.

I'm sure you'll see those numbers start changing now that Newcastle is past the easiest stretch of their schedule.

Originally posted by Luke Pass
This game is a fucking joke, 3 int's brought back to the house by Eurothrash. Obviously the TO's killed our team, but this game is getting to the point where it is not even close to realistic. You can obviously see our frustration. Nothing against Euro, you guys have a great team, nice game and good luck as you move forward.

Our QB had 2 int's the first 4 games and now 5 in this game, wow!!!

We had the same issue last season. We would be beating anyone, and then throw one to three TDs for the opposing team. So....we restructured our qb, and now he's doing much better.