User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Southeast Asia AA Leagues > Southeast Asia AA #2 > I guess there is no doubt who is #1 in each conference...
Page:
 
ksugg30
offline
Link
 
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=164007 - HRY dominates Idaho

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=163851 - The Drunken Monks destroy the Dragons

Lets hope we can continue to play to form in the playoffs to see who really is the best team in the league...
 
mcnorth
offline
Link
 
Dominating score - not a dominating performance. Outgained by Idaho but the chem hit killed our pass protection (well - in some instances it was just your DE's outlevelling our tackles), and we were guilty of sloppy turnovers and ST breakdowns. You played a great fourth quarter and capitalized on our mistakes. Hats off to you - but would you really call it 'dominating?'
 
Spiel
offline
Link
 
Palembang also didn't necessarily dominate Taiwan. Yardage was close, but turnovers were not. We gave up 14 points early in the game off of stupid turnovers.

Regardless, Palembang clearly deserved to win. It looked at first like this one was going to be a good game, but we just couldn't move the football or stop them from moving the football in the 2nd half.
 
drea
offline
Link
 
Yardage was close in the Monks vs. Dragons game. Turnovers just killed you guys Spiel.
 
nightstar289
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by mcnorth
Dominating score - not a dominating performance. Outgained by Idaho but the chem hit killed our pass protection (well - in some instances it was just your DE's outlevelling our tackles), and we were guilty of sloppy turnovers and ST breakdowns. You played a great fourth quarter and capitalized on our mistakes. Hats off to you - but would you really call it 'dominating?'


I'll agree with mcnorth here. Both sides were about equal, but Idaho got unlucky, and HRY took over in the 4th
 
Landry Skins
Skinny Laundry
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by nightstar289
Originally posted by mcnorth

Dominating score - not a dominating performance. Outgained by Idaho but the chem hit killed our pass protection (well - in some instances it was just your DE's outlevelling our tackles), and we were guilty of sloppy turnovers and ST breakdowns. You played a great fourth quarter and capitalized on our mistakes. Hats off to you - but would you really call it 'dominating?'


I'll agree with mcnorth here. Both sides were about equal, but Idaho got unlucky, and HRY took over in the 4th


... and a beautiful d-gameplan lol
 
ksugg30
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by mcnorth
Dominating score - not a dominating performance. Outgained by Idaho but the chem hit killed our pass protection (well - in some instances it was just your DE's outlevelling our tackles), and we were guilty of sloppy turnovers and ST breakdowns. You played a great fourth quarter and capitalized on our mistakes. Hats off to you - but would you really call it 'dominating?'


I completely agree with your assessment, I do however call it dominating, just because we were playing against the best players from two teams

 
FalcMonster23
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ksugg30
Originally posted by mcnorth

Dominating score - not a dominating performance. Outgained by Idaho but the chem hit killed our pass protection (well - in some instances it was just your DE's outlevelling our tackles), and we were guilty of sloppy turnovers and ST breakdowns. You played a great fourth quarter and capitalized on our mistakes. Hats off to you - but would you really call it 'dominating?'


I completely agree with your assessment, I do however call it dominating, just because we were playing against the best players from two teams



that is a good point.. says sometin about building a team through time
 
mcnorth
offline
Link
 
Agreed.

Also says something about chemistry "working as intended." However you feel about it Idaho is in pretty much the same place as they likely would have been without the player moves. Long range Idaho will be a better team but we'll have to wait for that day and that gives the league more time to catch-up - and I think that's fair.

Good game and good luck guys.
 
Hank Stram
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by mcnorth
Agreed.

Also says something about chemistry "working as intended." However you feel about it Idaho is in pretty much the same place as they likely would have been without the player moves. Long range Idaho will be a better team but we'll have to wait for that day and that gives the league more time to catch-up - and I think that's fair.

Good game and good luck guys.


I'm just grateful that if we end up playing Idaho in the playoffs, it'll be at our place!
 
nightstar289
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Thul
Originally posted by mcnorth

Agreed.

Also says something about chemistry "working as intended." However you feel about it Idaho is in pretty much the same place as they likely would have been without the player moves. Long range Idaho will be a better team but we'll have to wait for that day and that gives the league more time to catch-up - and I think that's fair.

Good game and good luck guys.


I'm just grateful that if we end up playing Idaho in the playoffs, it'll be at our place!


And the Yetis are just grateful that we won't have to face Idaho AND MMJ in the playoffs again

GO MMJ!!!!!!!! (We're 4-0 against MMJ )
 
Todo88
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by nightstar289
Originally posted by Thul

Originally posted by mcnorth


Agreed.

Also says something about chemistry "working as intended." However you feel about it Idaho is in pretty much the same place as they likely would have been without the player moves. Long range Idaho will be a better team but we'll have to wait for that day and that gives the league more time to catch-up - and I think that's fair.

Good game and good luck guys.


I'm just grateful that if we end up playing Idaho in the playoffs, it'll be at our place!


And the Yetis are just grateful that we won't have to face Idaho AND MMJ in the playoffs again

GO MMJ!!!!!!!! (We're 4-0 against MMJ )


And I loathe that fact every day.
 
Hank Stram
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by nightstar289

GO MMJ!!!!!!!! (We're 4-0 against MMJ )


Yet surprisingly, we've won the exact same number of conference championships.
 
ksugg30
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Thul
Originally posted by nightstar289


GO MMJ!!!!!!!! (We're 4-0 against MMJ )


Yet surprisingly, we've won the exact same number of conference championships.


LMAO

Your right on there... We have your #, and BGC and the Demons had ours. Of course the Demons have moved on, (although HRY did beat them in a Friendly this season) and BGC is no more...

 
mastawoo
offline
Link
 
GG Spiel and Dragons - score was definitely not indicative of the game itself. Some untimely turnovers really end up skewing it. Dominating isn't the word I'd use either.

Here's to our potential rematch in the playoffs, although they're a funny thing - wouldn't surprise me too much if one or both of us got booted by an upset.

Zeta, you guys look pretty damn tough, but Alpha's winning this season
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.