Who's going to reach 50 first?
CardinalsFavor
offline
offline
Originally posted by germains
Who's going to reach 50 first?
The guy with the easiest schedule.
Who's going to reach 50 first?
The guy with the easiest schedule.
Does it really matter? The gutted teams in A6 have diluted personal stats.
Chuck Justice has 25 sacks against 2 gutted teams and no sacks in any other games.
Vitis is legit, but those 6 sacks against the Sooners should be thrown out.
Brackenz has 22 sacks...with 19 against a gutted team.
Mendenham has 21 sacks...with 15 against a gutted team.
Based on this, Vitis should be the first...unless one of the other leaders plays a gutted team.
Chuck Justice has 25 sacks against 2 gutted teams and no sacks in any other games.
Vitis is legit, but those 6 sacks against the Sooners should be thrown out.
Brackenz has 22 sacks...with 19 against a gutted team.
Mendenham has 21 sacks...with 15 against a gutted team.
Based on this, Vitis should be the first...unless one of the other leaders plays a gutted team.
opspearhead
offline
offline
Doesn't matter to me at all. If Brackenz sacks help us win then the more the better. Our entire DLine (including backups) has the capability of producing sacks against the toughest teams in the league. It just depends on what kind of game they have.
That being said, it's a team sport. All we want is the team trophies at the end of the season.
That being said, it's a team sport. All we want is the team trophies at the end of the season.
germains
offline
offline
Originally posted by CardinalsFavor
Ok, whoever gets the first sack or hurry on the Fury gets the crown.
I'd like to scrimmage them just to see what we could do.
Ok, whoever gets the first sack or hurry on the Fury gets the crown.
I'd like to scrimmage them just to see what we could do.
Originally posted by CardinalsFavor
Ok, whoever gets the first sack or hurry on the Fury gets the crown.
Wow. I honestly didn't realize we didn't have any sacks or hurries allowed on the season. NICE!
Originally posted by germains
I'd like to scrimmage them just to see what we could do.
I've only got 10FP in the bank or I'd take you up on it. The more good teams we face, the better...especially since something I changed this season has totally screwed up our offense and defense.
Ok, whoever gets the first sack or hurry on the Fury gets the crown.
Wow. I honestly didn't realize we didn't have any sacks or hurries allowed on the season. NICE!
Originally posted by germains
I'd like to scrimmage them just to see what we could do.
I've only got 10FP in the bank or I'd take you up on it. The more good teams we face, the better...especially since something I changed this season has totally screwed up our offense and defense.
mpowell
offline
offline
Yeah, the leader board is completely worthless now. I think it's pretty clear that the number of teams going up or down leagues each year should have been doubled to begin with. A#6 has avoided seeing many gutted teams so far, but this season it's like we were hit with a plague of them. I wish we could remove certain teams from contention, so we could see what the leader board would like with the stats from all the games of the bottom 4 teams taken out.
MattMan Firespot
offline
offline
Yea its really tough to judge things at this point because of the gutted teams...It takes till week 16 to even get a clear idea of where players stand and thats not necessarily even accurate then.
A team with lvl 10's week 1, will be a team full of lvl 15's week 16, meanwhile the team they played first, and last, have probably grown by 2 lvls. So it dillutes everything with unclear results.
Like Ops said, we do things to get the W, so, the individual achievements are a very distant second, we hope to put 11 guys on the field who collectively, are better than the 11 on the other side. Some teams have 1 or 2 players who stand out, and are great at what they do, but collectively, their only as strong as the weakest link.
I much rather have multiple players in the top 10's of many different categories then have 1 guy at #1. Only 1 trophy I want.
A team with lvl 10's week 1, will be a team full of lvl 15's week 16, meanwhile the team they played first, and last, have probably grown by 2 lvls. So it dillutes everything with unclear results.
Like Ops said, we do things to get the W, so, the individual achievements are a very distant second, we hope to put 11 guys on the field who collectively, are better than the 11 on the other side. Some teams have 1 or 2 players who stand out, and are great at what they do, but collectively, their only as strong as the weakest link.
I much rather have multiple players in the top 10's of many different categories then have 1 guy at #1. Only 1 trophy I want.
mpowell
offline
offline
Yeah, I hope fame isn't too related to individual awards when they institute that. A lot of them are just based on whether you do a good job of running up your stats in the blowouts. Who cares about that?
MattMan Firespot
offline
offline
Yea I think Borts going a little bit too far with all that stuff...As long as there is a way to make sure the rich dont get richer and poor get poorer than I guesse im all for it...There needs to be an even playing field...I think chemistry was one of the worst ideas in GLB history...People complain about it and the admins always make the argument that it has so little effect but if that were the case theres no sense to even having it in the first place. Ours is finally up to a good lvl after having to do tons of recruiting after season 2 and 3 in order to be competitive enough to play with the big-boys.
Fame sucks.
Fame sucks.
canes30
offline
offline
I think the fame will be pretty cool. Most defensive stat leaders will be on gutted teams as they get a lot more defensive snaps to get tackles,PD's, KR yards, etc.
bgdave
offline
offline
Originally posted by AirMcMVP
Does it really matter? The gutted teams in A6 have diluted personal stats.
Chuck Justice has 25 sacks against 2 gutted teams and no sacks in any other games.
Vitis is legit, but those 6 sacks against the Sooners should be thrown out.
Brackenz has 22 sacks...with 19 against a gutted team.
Mendenham has 21 sacks...with 15 against a gutted team.
Based on this, Vitis should be the first...unless one of the other leaders plays a gutted team.
Sad but true.
Does it really matter? The gutted teams in A6 have diluted personal stats.
Chuck Justice has 25 sacks against 2 gutted teams and no sacks in any other games.
Vitis is legit, but those 6 sacks against the Sooners should be thrown out.
Brackenz has 22 sacks...with 19 against a gutted team.
Mendenham has 21 sacks...with 15 against a gutted team.
Based on this, Vitis should be the first...unless one of the other leaders plays a gutted team.
Sad but true.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.