Warrior General Games

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=657543
Any advice?
Thanks.

1) There's a specific CB forum.

2) Nobody can help if you don't open his build.

Because you touch yourself at night.

Open your build and maybe you will get some help.

Bort hates you.

Because you spent points on SA instead of agility.

Originally posted by xTheTruthx
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=657543
Any advice?
Thanks.

Be more specific.

Do you mean why you don't make bigger run backs?

CB's aren't the best returners.

Do you mean why can't you cover your man on Defense?

You are tired from returning kicks. It takes a lot out of you.

my guess is its because your an eagles fan

in semi seriousness you should work on your catching, jumping and strength as well as confidence...

catching- interceptions cant do it with out decent catch ability

jumping- the qb throws ajump ball can you go up and knock it away....didn't think so

strength- jam the wide out at the line if you play tight, also is a key factor in knocking the ball out of the wideouts hand during a jump ball

confidence- you get beat once going for the int he will be hesitant about it again...

Its because you made a track star, not a football player. Your guy can run around and recognize what play is happening, but cant actually do anything defensively to stop it.

He cant intercept the ball because he has no catching.
He cant knock it down because he has no jumping.
He cant tackle the WR because he has no tackling.
A stiff breeze knocks him to the ground because he has no strength.
You're never on the field because you have minimal stamina.

Originally posted by Ramius
Its because you made a track star, not a football player. Your guy can run around and recognize what play is happening, but cant actually do anything defensively to stop it.

He cant intercept the ball because he has no catching.
He cant knock it down because he has no jumping.
He cant tackle the WR because he has no tackling.
A stiff breeze knocks him to the ground because he has no strength.
You're never on the field because you have minimal stamina.

actually jumping helps a lot more towards getting INTS than catching does.
a lot of jumping without catching will yield more INTS than vice versa.

Originally posted by serialced
Originally posted by Ramius

Its because you made a track star, not a football player. Your guy can run around and recognize what play is happening, but cant actually do anything defensively to stop it.

He cant intercept the ball because he has no catching.
He cant knock it down because he has no jumping.
He cant tackle the WR because he has no tackling.
A stiff breeze knocks him to the ground because he has no strength.
You're never on the field because you have minimal stamina.

actually jumping helps a lot more towards getting INTS than catching does.
a lot of jumping without catching will yield more INTS than vice versa.

damn it thats what ive been doing wrong with my dbs...do you have any proof? or was it just speculation?

The above is true.

Originally posted by serialced
actually jumping helps a lot more towards getting INTS than catching does.
a lot of jumping without catching will yield more INTS than vice versa.

This makes no logical sense at all.

Catching should be the most important attribute to be able to catch something.

Originally posted by ssaints4ever
Originally posted by serialced

actually jumping helps a lot more towards getting INTS than catching does.
a lot of jumping without catching will yield more INTS than vice versa.

This makes no logical sense at all.

Catching should be the most important attribute to be able to catch something.

You might want to check your logic.

If you can catch, but can't get to the ball... how likely are you to get the ball?

If you can get to the ball, but got poor catching... how likely are you to get the ball?

jumping > catching - just as it should be

Originally posted by RAPB
Originally posted by ssaints4ever

Originally posted by serialced


actually jumping helps a lot more towards getting INTS than catching does.
a lot of jumping without catching will yield more INTS than vice versa.

This makes no logical sense at all.

Catching should be the most important attribute to be able to catch something.

You might want to check your logic.

If you can catch, but can't get to the ball... how likely are you to get the ball?

If you can get to the ball, but got poor catching... how likely are you to get the ball?

jumping > catching - just as it should be


What good is getting to the ball if you can't catch it?

Someone with horrible catching shouldn't be catching many INTs because WRs with horrible catching drop passes like crazy.

Again, Catching should be the most important attribute to be able to catch something.