User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Ratphlegm
offline
Link
 
Alright, I'm still pretty new to GLB, and there's probably a thread like this somewhere, but I haven't found it...

I'm trying to build a player who is a capable ball-stripper while still being able to make 90% of his tackles. Naturally, being under level 20 still, and trying to do two contrary things, he's had issues, so I'm trying to figure out how much of a bonus to tackling "Wrap-up" personal tactics gives a player.

In our playoff game today, my level 19 SS missed 2 of his 4 tackles, his tackling is 46, str is 46, vision 25 (low I know), 20 confidence (also low), 48 speed and 36 agility, with at least 3 in all his hard hitter SA's and 2 change direction & super vision, so you guys know what I'm working with here. I had his tackling settings on Balanced, and he was playing Hard. Substitution settings for our team were 90/95. He missed tackles against a level 16 HB (appears power) and a level 19 HB (appears power/combo), and also succeeded in tackling the latter twice. Throughout this season, my SS lead our team in tackles and missed tackles, I mostly had him on wrap-up, but switched to balanced or even power tackling when going against weaker competition, to see what kind of success he had.

Also in our game today, one of our backup DE's, level 13, 30 str, 30 tackling, 36 speed, 48 agi, 27 vision, 24 confidence, no important SA's went 6/6 in making tackles. He tackled the level 19 combo back , a level 16 (agility?) HB 3 times, the level 16 (power?) HB, and a level 12 CB on STeams. I assume he was on Wrap-up and playing normal.

Same game today, our level 17 FS was 5/5 tackling - 24 str, 27 tackling, 60 speed, 39 agility, 27 vision, 17 confidence, 2 in most SA's. He was on Wrap-up and playing Hard. He tackled the level 19 HB twice, a level 18 TE twice, and a level 18 WR.

Comparing the two safeties, the SS has almost twice as much str and tackling, and failed half the time vs what I'd guess is about the same str/agility opposition that the FS tackled without incident. What I'm seeing is that wrap-up gives better than a 50% bonus to tackling. I realize I've only cited examples from one game, but similar things happened throughout the season, and probably the most glaring incident was the first game of the regular season for our team (mostly level 10-13), against a team of all level 1 humans (slow-build team). I had my SS set to power tackling, and his str and tackling at the time were about 30 if I remember right. He missed 2/3 of his tackles, all vs. TE's, so I can understand, even a level 1 TE could have 30+ str...

Another strange thing was that the FS I mentioned above, with low str, tacklingm no points in Big Hit SA and playing on wrap-up the whole season, forced more fumbles than did the SS who is among the strongest and best tackling (according to stats) defenders on the team and who has 4 points in Big Hit and 3 in Monster Hit.

Shouldn't the tackling styles use different stats to determine how you attempt a tackle? Power should be more useful for a guy with very high strength, and be a better counter for a guy's forward progress, while wrap up should mean you're more likely to make the tackle, but also give up an extra yard or three while the guy's momentum continues forward.

Since this is after all (allegedly) a Beta game, could I get some input from the rest of you playtesters?
 
Link
 
Unfortunately, everything but wrap up is still a joke. They say they made a few changes this season to make the other styles not as useless, but they still are. The change I saw is that when using wrap up I rarely force fumbles anymore, when I used to quite regularly. Maybe they'll try again this off-season.
 
Melancholy
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by livebytheblitz
Unfortunately, everything but wrap up is still a joke. They say they made a few changes this season to make the other styles not as useless, but they still are. The change I saw is that when using wrap up I rarely force fumbles anymore, when I used to quite regularly. Maybe they'll try again this off-season.


actually, i don't remember them saying they were trying to make the other styles useless. As far as I know, the point was to make wrapup less powerful with terrible tackling skill. For instance, you shouldn't be making a large percent of your tackles AND forcing a lot of fumbles if you have 35 tackling and using wrapup.
 
Deathblade
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by livebytheblitz
The change I saw is that when using wrap up I rarely force fumbles anymore, when I used to quite regularly. Maybe they'll try again this off-season.


Which was the entire purpose of the change.

 
Ratphlegm
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Deathblade
Originally posted by livebytheblitz

The change I saw is that when using wrap up I rarely force fumbles anymore, when I used to quite regularly. Maybe they'll try again this off-season.


Which was the entire purpose of the change.



Well, I only have one season of solid experience with this, but like I said, our weaker FS with poor tackling and no strip ball SA's caused more fumbles playing Wrap up than did the strong, good tackling SS with several points in strip SA's playing in varying tackling modes. The SS also had almost twice as many tackle attempts... I understand it's probably just bad luck for the SS and good luck for the FS since its a really small sample size... but now that I think about it, one of our corners, also around 20 str and 20 tackling playing wrap-up also caused more fumbles than the SS, in fewer tackling attempts.
 
Melancholy
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ratphlegm
Originally posted by Deathblade

Originally posted by livebytheblitz


The change I saw is that when using wrap up I rarely force fumbles anymore, when I used to quite regularly. Maybe they'll try again this off-season.


Which was the entire purpose of the change.



Well, I only have one season of solid experience with this, but like I said, our weaker FS with poor tackling and no strip ball SA's caused more fumbles playing Wrap up than did the strong, good tackling SS with several points in strip SA's playing in varying tackling modes. The SS also had almost twice as many tackle attempts... I understand it's probably just bad luck for the SS and good luck for the FS since its a really small sample size... but now that I think about it, one of our corners, also around 20 str and 20 tackling playing wrap-up also caused more fumbles than the SS, in fewer tackling attempts.


the FS/CB had most of their attempts against WR while the SS had most attempts against HBs? Not that that is the real answer, but it Could explain some of it. Not sure.
 
Ratphlegm
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Melancholy
the FS/CB had most of their attempts against WR while the SS had most attempts against HBs? Not that that is the real answer, but it Could explain some of it. Not sure.


You would think... lemme check. FS got FF's against... HB both times, CB got them vs HB both times as well... makes me wonder if catching is helpful against fumbling also. It looks like our team never forced a fumble hitting a WR all season, one on a TE, one on a QB and the rest on HB's, including scrimmages and playoffs.
 
WolverinesFan
offline
Link
 
Not that it matters much, since you are in a higher league and my guy is still in the D-League(which probably nullifies anything I say) but my LB(I know different position) has 49 strength and 35 tackling, and has missed 3 tackles total(Two were at level 1/2 and I finally missed one again when I switched to power tackling) right now though, I am set on Balanced have done fine. Guess I will see how I really do next season when I get on a real team.

In 12 games(2 were playoffs) I had 49 tackles/3 missed

I really could have had more tackles if I had been playing the whole season with my settings now.

Last two games(1 playoff/1 Scrimmage) I have had 14 tackles.

Most of the season settings were - Wrap-Up/Power Pass Rush/Run Focus
Past two games on Balanced/Combo Pass Rush/Balanced focus.

(I also played in the SEA League for two games and had 57 plays and made two tackles with none missed.)

EDIT: Fumbling, I don't know about. Since I have not caused any fumbles myself.
Last edited Sep 7, 2008 16:16:03
 
tautology
offline
Link
 
There are a lot of misconceptions about how to force fumbles.
 
Ratphlegm
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tautology
There are a lot of misconceptions about how to force fumbles.


... As helpful as this comment is, it doesn't explain why guys playing wrap-up style, which specifically says that you will cause fewer fumbles than balanced, have caused more. And I don't mean because just about everyone plays on wrap-up.

I assume these are just some of those misconceptions. In real life, most fumbles are caused by making solid contact with the ball when making a hit. Hitting a guy hard where the focal point of your hit is the football, is in general the most common cause of fumbles. Also: Hitting a QB from behind and swatting at his throwing arm, swatting down at the ball being carried and making solid contact to knock it down, reaching in from the side and ripping the ball out, and in very rare instances, meeting a guy head on when he can't get low and simply wrestling the ball away from him.
 
tautology
offline
Link
 
Take a look at the plays where the fumbles are forced...if you look at enough of them (enough to see past the completely random sim factors), it might become enlightening.
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.