User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Can we please change from 8 playoff teams to 6 playoff teams?
Page:
 
WiSeIVIaN
online
Link
 
The problem with 8 playoff teams is there is no incentive for top teams to truly TRY during the regular season, since they get no benefit of being a #1 or #2 seed. It also makes it less competitive to fight for the final playoff spots, since often where will be 1-2 "bad" teams per conference, giving a 4/4 chance or a 4/5 chance to make the playoffs...

People LOVE the competitiveness of the NFL playoffs, where only 7/16 (44%) of teams make the playoffs, but in GLB we have 8/12 (67%) of teams making the playoffs.

To make a change would help the competitiveness of the regular season.


Edit to add, I agree with RC's discord suggestion:

6 playoff teams
Top2/6 get bye week.
2 teams (#4 each conference) don't demote.
4 teams demote.

This let's teams fight for a lot more (top2 seed for bye week, top6 to make playoffs, top8 to not demote) and would lead to a much more engaging regular season in all leagues...
Edited by WiSeIVIaN on Jan 5, 2024 14:49:00
Edited by WiSeIVIaN on Jan 5, 2024 12:52:11
Edited by WiSeIVIaN on Jan 5, 2024 11:30:06
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
The problem with 8 playoff teams is there is no incentive for top teams to truly TRY during the regular season, since they get no benefit of being a #1 or #2 seed. It also makes it less competitive to fight for the final playoff spots, since often where will be 1-2 "bad" teams per conference, giving a 4/4 chance or a 4/5 chance to make the playoffs...

People LOVE the competitiveness of the NFL playoffs, where only 7/16 (44%) of teams make the playoffs, but in GLB we have 8/12 (67%) of teams making the playoffs.

To make a change would help the competitiveness of the WL regular season, as well as help Pro's competitive balance with more teams moving up/down from WL every year.



until we know how many good teams there are we don't know this

I like the 8/12 in WL because every game is tough

I doubt National Pro will be competitive for WL calibur teams
 
drewd21
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by reddogrw

until we know how many good teams there are we don't know this

I like the 8/12 in WL because every game is tough

I doubt National Pro will be competitive for WL calibur teams


 
Robert79
offline
Link
 
Hmm.
Edited by Robert79 on Jan 5, 2024 12:18:01
 
WiSeIVIaN
online
Link
 
Originally posted by reddogrw

until we know how many good teams there are we don't know this

I like the 8/12 in WL because every game is tough

I doubt National Pro will be competitive for WL calibur teams


If you're a WL quality playoff team, don't demote?

You're making the false assumption there are exactly 8 WL quality teams that belong to stay there, but that's only because that's what we hade historically.

For arguments sake, let's pretend there are 18 WL quality teams in GLB at any one time.

Previous system:
8 stay in WL, 4 promote to WL, 4 demote to Pro, 2 stay in Pro

New proposed system:
6 stay in WL, 6 promote to WL, 6 demote to Pro.


Why is the proposed system system so much worse in your opinion?
More WL demotions and less pro leagues leads to better pro leagues.
 
WiSeIVIaN
online
Link
 
Though honestly I'm fully fine with...

6 playoff teams
Top2 get bye week.
2 teams (#4 each conference) don't demote.
4 teams demote.
 
WiSeIVIaN
online
Link
 
In general fighting for things is good. Bye week, playoff spot, not demoting, are 3 great ways to make the regular season way more engaging
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
If you're a WL quality playoff team, don't demote?

You're making the false assumption there are exactly 8 WL quality teams that belong to stay there, but that's only because that's what we hade historically.

For arguments sake, let's pretend there are 18 WL quality teams in GLB at any one time.

Previous system:
8 stay in WL, 4 promote to WL, 4 demote to Pro, 2 stay in Pro

New proposed system:
6 stay in WL, 6 promote to WL, 6 demote to Pro.


Why is the proposed system system so much worse in your opinion?
More WL demotions and less pro leagues leads to better pro leagues.


Ryan 2-3 teams
Mauler 2 teams
Hood/HHWC
TSW

8 right there, plus Playmakers, Nomad, MM, War Machine

4 good teams would demote each season
 
WiSeIVIaN
online
Link
 
So now you're unhappy with 4 teams demoting?

Let's just making WL static with 0 demotes, and have only network teams be allowed in to the exclusive club?

Please see updated OP, I'm good with 6 playoff teams, two nonplayoff staying in WL, and 4 demoting.
 
Kenshinzen
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by reddogrw
Ryan 2-3 teams
Mauler 2 teams
Hood/HHWC
TSW

8 right there, plus Playmakers, Nomad, MM, War Machine

4 good teams would demote each season


Don’t see Athens here, don’t like your plan.
 
WiSeIVIaN
online
Link
 
If you guys are not aware, Agency now has 3 flagships (TSW, Nomad, and Athens Empire).

These 3 teams will combine to win the next 6 WL championships, but get upset in s111...
 
Kenshinzen
offline
Link
 
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
+1

There are tons of good teams now and I doubt any squad can cruise control to a top 2 seed without scouting/tagging. RNG is huge and eliminating 1 bad sim rewards regular season effort.
 
WiSeIVIaN
online
Link
 
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
+1

There are tons of good teams now and I doubt any squad can cruise control to a top 2 seed without scouting/tagging. RNG is huge and eliminating 1 bad sim rewards regular season effort.



Yup, would be a legit reward for teams that dominate the regular season, as well as give more importance and incentive to everyone's regular season efforts!
 
Pwned
offline
Link
 
I would be a fan of this if everyone only owned one team. Right now it would literally just be removing agents from the fun. I hate these topics because it just makes me sound like a whiney bitch.

Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
RNG is huge and eliminating 1 bad sim rewards regular season effort.


In other words, removing a sim against a non RC26/Hood/Mauler team, which shouldn't scare anyone, right? Everyone else is super inferior, why even bother wasting the energy to lift your noses! This is probably the dumbest post in the entire thread, I expected a little more from you. Your mentality will change when you realize just how far away from the spotlight the KC teams actually are. Enjoy the cesspool with the rest of us bud, you may be the best of the second rate. #Elitist

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN

Yup, would be a legit reward for teams that dominate the regular season, as well as give more importance and incentive to everyone's regular season efforts!


In other words, rewarding the networks who are going to make up 90% of Pro + moving forward. How is this not obvious? I expected more from you, you know better than this! You just went to war with Mauler Group before the apocalypse because they were able to manipulate the playoff system in WL with an 8 team format. What makes you think they won't do it when there are only 6 spots to go around? I'll say this in my nicest Michael Irvin voice.. "C'MON MAN!" Since I love you, I'm gonna give you the chance to pick which agents you think deserve a spot in the playoff equation every season, with this change we would have room for 2. The rest don't even deserve a chance to upset someone in Round 1.

Pick 4: zzman, Kenshitzen, ewinter, pooperdog, playmakers, GroupOh, Gambler, Smitty, ME?!?, probably missing a handful of other quality owners that help make up the second tier of teams that are keeping this game alive for now.

Edit - I'll let you pick 4 because there are only 4 teams demoting from WL into 2 leagues, so my math was off.

Edited by Pwned on Jan 6, 2024 11:23:58
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.