User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > Choosing the position of the WR for each play
Page:
 
darncat
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rocdog21
I'm not trying to knock on you or anything, but you keep talking about how good your WR is at blocking, and I'm just letting you know based off the replays you chose to post why she blocked them so good. That's what my point is.

Not sure how you know what other DB's strengths are set at....but ok.


You are not comprehending what you are reading.

I specifically said my WR is no kind of elite blocker- that is the whole point.
A WR DOES NOT have to be a world class blocker to block the vast majority of CBs!
In fact, the typical amount of strength a pWR gets seems to be plenty to block most CBs-
and if block is really needed, it'd be added near the end anyhow due to lack of alg.
It really isn't going to do much good for rookie WRs- they'd do just as well maxxing their strength,
which is a major so that at least also makes sense to the end build.

I chose the plays i chose to show not because of the CB but because it was an interesting play.
You just aren't reading- I specifically said you can watch any play of ours this season for a similar result.
In fact its irrelevant who the CB is, other than they are a typical young CB who can be easily blocked
by a WR with any kind of strength, no blocking needed, which is the whole point of this thread...
do try to keep up
 
darncat
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
Also, strangely enough, while having high strength and high blocking is great for O-linemen, it's not really needed outside of the O-line. I've used defensive players on ST's as blockers as long as they had high enough strength and, amazingly enough, they could hold a block long enough to let the returner get past... and you KNOW those defensive guys didn't have a buttload of blocking skill. So if I were building a WR (which I've done before) that is not only good at catching enough to be a good possession WR... but also is able to block on outside runs, go with Strength. If you can slip a little blocking in as well, great.


This is the whole point i was making, obviously not as well. You can't use custom WR spots,
so go with pWRs if you want good outside blocking and they'll be fine- without even the need to add block.
A strength first pWR will get tons of pancakes early in his career without needing block, and a strength 2nd
pWR will not get pancakes but he'll hold those blocks plenty long enough. Maybe in the end it would be nice
to slip in some block, but wait for the end, when it isn't torpedoing a build- it isn't even necessary for a rookie dot.
 
Rocdog21
Sancho
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by darncat
You are not comprehending what you are reading.

I specifically said my WR is no kind of elite blocker- that is the whole point.
A WR DOES NOT have to be a world class blocker to block the vast majority of CBs!
In fact, the typical amount of strength a pWR gets seems to be plenty to block most CBs-
and if block is really needed, it'd be added near the end anyhow due to lack of alg.
It really isn't going to do much good for rookie WRs- they'd do just as well maxxing their strength,
which is a major so that at least also makes sense to the end build.

I chose the plays i chose to show not because of the CB but because it was an interesting play.
You just aren't reading- I specifically said you can watch any play of ours this season for a similar result.
In fact its irrelevant who the CB is, other than they are a typical young CB who can be easily blocked
by a WR with any kind of strength, no blocking needed, which is the whole point of this thread...
do try to keep up


Do you need a snickers?

It's hard to comprehend anything you say when all you do is contradict yourself.

ProKop was right...you really are overthinking it.

 
ProfessionalKop
Gangstalicious
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rocdog21
Do you need a snickers?

It's hard to comprehend anything you say when all you do is contradict yourself.

ProKop was right...you really are overthinking it.



The usual.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.