Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Kurt Davey
Using your number of teams "492" that brings the running average down to 2.55 per team. Now I've been on a lot teams over the years and It seems to me that Most if not all teams carry at least 3 running backs on their teams.

Seems to me that there is a demand at the RB spot and besides we have obviously EARNED our free players for being good customers of GLB. Let us use them the way we want to.

Add to that most teams returner is a HB
So it should be 3.5 imo

Originally posted by Kurt Davey
Using your number of teams "492" that brings the running average down to 2.55 per team. Now I've been on a lot teams over the years and It seems to me that Most if not all teams carry at least 3 running backs on their teams.

Seems to me that there is a demand at the RB spot and besides we have obviously EARNED our free players for being good customers of GLB. Let us use them the way we want to.

I agree with this, with the added that some teams have 5 HB's in their squad.

Originally posted by Sonic
I agree with this, with the added that some teams have 5 HB's in their squad.

i agree that it could be higher, but from a business standpoint, hb/qb should never have been a free player. just look at how many people only have 1-2 players and 1 of them is qb or hb. i will never make a qb or hb unless i can use my free player slot.

i also wonder if the number of players shown is is using a different number than the demand uses. there are so many old old old players still not retired.

Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
i agree that it could be higher, but from a business standpoint, hb/qb should never have been a free player. just look at how many people only have 1-2 players and 1 of them is qb or hb. i will never make a qb or hb unless i can use my free player slot.

i also wonder if the number of players shown is is using a different number than the demand uses. there are so many old old old players still not retired.

The biggest problem is the equation itself is pointless. Any WR or TE or CB created today isn't competing for a job against all of the OTHER dots at that position that exist--instead they're attempting to fill positions on TODAY's rookie and pee wee teams.

Last but not least, dots created for PeeWee teams should never count against the 'cap' either since they're one-and-done builds 99% of the time... besides... if someone wants to keep their PeeWee dot going past the end of the PeeWee season, THEN you could count it against the cap.

Probably won't happen but;

http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5279847