Warrior General Games

So I think this game lost a lot of its appeal when the simulation stopped changing.

Can we agree on a few 'tweaks' that would be easy to implement that would make a big enough change to throw a fork in the machine.

No.

Sure but ngth

#1. Award all 16 TPs (from days 41-48) on day 41 (or creation day for new players). That way day 48 isn't hyper critical anymore.

change your underwear

Originally posted by Bluesman
Sure but ngth

Without seriously tweaking the build system and such, what the game needs more than anything is a seasonal change in some of the engine dynamics. Hypothetically, lets say that currently the base number for a pass to be completed is set at 50%. This is the number from which all the bits and pieces add onto or subtract from to arrive at the final % on any giver pass play for the result. As long as that number stays static, then the game remains stale and the builds as well. However, if that changes from season to season, then I believe teams would build more towards the balanced side (meaning like REAL professional teams)... than just doing one trick pony style teams (like College teams and High School teams do because they CAN'T pass for crap). I dunno about most here but, the way things are going, I doubt in a few years if you'll see anything but ALL RUN style teams. Why pass when it sucks to try and running is so successful anyways? That's a byproduct of Game Design... not dot building... and can be fixed by tweaking the game engine dynamics rather than trying to rebuild the whole damn thing. Besides... would be nice to see things change from season to season rather than what we got. However....

Originally posted by Bluesman
Sure but ngth

Cut build length in half.

NGTH but it would be the best change.

Or

Let us auto build to whatever darn level we need.

Originally posted by RiverRat2
Cut build length in half.

NGTH but it would be the best change.

Or

Let us auto build to whatever darn level we need.



Only problem with this suggestion is that they'll simply say you can already do that... in GLB2.

no. Beyond the whole NGTH thing from Warrior General,

No chance on getting "all" to agree. This place is filled with A-holes that would rather vote no on something just to piss off the majority of the user base than to vote yes for a simple change that makes common sense.

Or agree the game was a novelty and it always sucked. It is like that woman you meet with huge boobs. Eventually you realise she is crazy and very ugly in the morning without makeup. Then you think well her boobs are not worth this so you just show up from time to time to play around but will never get tied up into that mess again.

boobies!

Originally posted by sunder B
no. Beyond the whole NGTH thing from Warrior General,

No chance on getting "all" to agree. This place is filled with A-holes that would rather vote no on something just to piss off the majority of the user base than to vote yes for a simple change that makes common sense.

sad but true.

0% chance that we can all agree






or get along