Warrior General Games

So I was reviewing a couple of builds tonight and had a thought:

"Why can't we purchase BOTH 'Trees' of the CEQ?"

Have a speedster WR? Why not buy the possession tree as well?

Why not allow a shutdown CB to buy the speedster tree as well?

And so on for other positions on both sides of the ball.

Why not allow all dots to add both trees if the agent that built it feels that such an addition increases the effectiveness?

Such a change would shake things up, and invigorate the "standard" building methods. It would force agents to re-review the decisions regarding SA allocation. Right now, the majority of dots have little investment into the trees that aren't selected. That would likely change if there was already a "tree" investment. Such a change would also serve to generate an increase to the revenue the game generates.

Larry, not sure but it seems like.... a VERY long long long time ago, a suggestion was made quite similar to this. Realize I'm talking like... years ago (many many seasons since have passed)... but if I remember right the original suggestion was to allow us to 'create' CEQ trees rather than being forced to simply choose between one or the other. I could be wrong... maybe it was about simply the 'Tree's themselves... but I think I do remember the suggestion getting locked as a NGTH.
I'm all for it seriously. In fact I'd like to see the ability to create your own tree (with those SA's already in the trees themselves by mixing and matching them in their appropriate corresponding slots) and be able to choose that [created] tree for your CEQ. So +1 from me but... I've pretty much given up on making any suggestions for GLB original. WG has shown nothing but complete apathy for their original child.

I'm not suggesting we "create" trees.

I just want to click on a box and BUY a tree that's already created.

Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
I'm not suggesting we "create" trees.

I just want to click on a box and BUY a tree that's already created.

Like buying training slots, but with flex instead, and with only the two options.

I've always liked the idea of being able to create your own SA tree. I would think that the SA's could be ranked as a 1st or 5th slot meaning you'd have to decide which way you create your tree. If you wanted to deviate from the creation tree, then that would cost flex and then you would have to decide which SA you'd want (keep the one currently in the slot or use BT's to change out).

specialize in everything!

+1

I would prefer it if they just sorted out the problem with my dot not getting his stats.

it's*

Bort would have more flex used up and likely lead to a little more cash for him.

Originally posted by haole
it's*

its*

oh wait, you were correcting the thread title.

thought you were gender policing darkus

+

+1

I suspect the code to the game was lost in a basement flood years ago.

Originally posted by yello1
I suspect the code to the game was lost in a basement flood years ago.



more like used as a sock after a long night of fapping.