Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Catullus16
sure, although then once that flex is gone would you just leave?

avoiding that was most of the point behind the refund system in the first place.

my comment was geared towards allowing those of us who bought lots of flex while the game was being developed to at least use it all up quicker since the development was abandoned and the game was permitted to go stale.

I would never buy flex from WGG again. Fool me once....

Not to rub it in but...

Flex Points: 621062 ( spend/buy/earn )

Originally posted by BADGERBACKER
Not to rub it in but...

Flex Points: 621062 ( spend/buy/earn )



lol someone owes you a cookie or something

Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
No company is going to undermine it's own product

that's exactly what WG did when they came out with the Deuce

Originally posted by UnsaidPlayer
Why would it not be a good idea to charge $20-$25 for a PeeWee team per season? That would include AE and flex for boosting.

Users would be able to choose to play solo or up to four users.

Having the maximum User cut off at four would still ensure Bort a reward at the end of each season.

Having a set price per season would attract more single player users. At the same time making the games more competitive.

This formula would have GLB with a more steady and consistent cash flow and Users would not have to take it in the asshole with the current price scale.


Yes, I think that might not be a terrible idea.

The only problem I see with trying to focus on the pee wee line is that a large part of GLB's appeal is the dot building process, and there is a lot less of that going on at the pee wee level.

Which is why, despite the cheaper aspect of pee wee even now dot wise, its hard to fill a roster even in pee wee gold.

Originally posted by Moretti
I think it would be fun to run a team with cpu players with set attributes that you can view. Before the season starts you get to draft a new team, like how a fantasy football team works, that way you dont have to worry as much about individual users and their players allocated to the team.

To me that would be interesting for a number of factors but it would make trading relevant and allow more teams to be competitive purely from the coordinating side of it.

Regarding flex cost I have been sitting on a large pile for a years now with little way to burn it all off without fear of having to purchase more between the return. I think from the consumer standpoint this was a horrible currency as the gave up on the game before I could get the return I intended. GLB2 is so far from what GLB1 is, regardless of perceived improvement or not, Im not sure why that was considered acceptable to stop development on smaller items that would improvement game enjoyability here. WGG has identified there is no knock out punch to improve GLB back to its heyday so all development was ceased instead of continuing to improve the product regardless of its overall effect.



Yes making the CPU pieces of the game more interesting would be a vast improvement.

But you couldn't just rely on that - not without losing the dot building angle which is such a big part of the games appeal. Unless, that is, you could build the CPUs.

Originally posted by yello1
Yes, I think that might not be a terrible idea.

The only problem I see with trying to focus on the pee wee line is that a large part of GLB's appeal is the dot building process, and there is a lot less of that going on at the pee wee level.

Which is why, despite the cheaper aspect of pee wee even now dot wise, its hard to fill a roster even in pee wee gold.

Inaccurate, I actually had more people willing to make dots than there were people to recruit them last season.

In fact, I started holding registration for the peewee draft, there are already near 100 free agents registered, and nobody has registered a team to draft them yet.

If you don't boost or buy custom equipment peewee is free (at least you don't LOSE flex) to be competitive in, with 3 of the 4 teams who boosted this season already having mentioned they weren't boosting next season (or at least mostly)... I don't see how it even matters not to boost.

Originally posted by 5STAR
What is wrong with the economy?

What isn't?

Originally posted by TJ Spikes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjmjqlOPd6A

lol

Originally posted by Stoned Beaver
Inaccurate, I actually had more people willing to make dots than there were people to recruit them last season.

In fact, I started holding registration for the peewee draft, there are already near 100 free agents registered, and nobody has registered a team to draft them yet.

I stand corrected.

I guess things have changed. I sold two of my pee wee teams due to the empty rosters every season.

Originally posted by yello1
What isn't?

Sounds like you are blaming the economy for your personal problems. Get an education or skill and maybe you will stop blaming others

Originally posted by 5STAR
Sounds like you are blaming the economy for your personal problems. Get an education or skill and maybe you will stop blaming others

1) I wasn't asking for a handout, work on your reading skills.

2) This is about the game as a whole, not me. In case you hadn't noticed the game population is crap. Basic economics tells you that as demand decreases while supply remains constant that prices must also decrease. As such Bort is positively driving away customers by maintaining the same price he charged when demand was much higher. That's an education thing maybe you should try alearning.

3) I'm a lawyer with a professional wife (not that profession) and 14 years of college and graduate school between us. So try not to judge, you suck at it.