Is a final build EL of 1317.1 considered 'decent' or 'meh'?
Edited by coachingubigr on Nov 29, 2015 17:40:45
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Question about effective level
Originally posted by coachingubigr
Is a final build EL of 1313.1 considered 'decent' or 'meh'?
a 4 AE WR that would be good
how many AE and what position?
Is a final build EL of 1313.1 considered 'decent' or 'meh'?
a 4 AE WR that would be good
how many AE and what position?
King of Bling
offline
offline
EL is not neccesarily indicative of quality of a build. Sly had a team about 3 seasons ago that was 100 EL higher than any team in GLB yet they sucked. Sub-500 in Natty Pro. EL can mean a quality build but it is not always the case. Certain plateaus with particular positions, VA's, AE additions, etc all enter into the analysis.
Post the build and you'll likely get a few legit comments smattered in with all the BS ones
Post the build and you'll likely get a few legit comments smattered in with all the BS ones
Originally posted by coachingubigr
3 AEQ speedy WR
not bad
1350-1400 is about where a really good one would end up - like your teammate
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4535103
3 AEQ speedy WR
not bad
1350-1400 is about where a really good one would end up - like your teammate
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4535103
Originally posted by King of Bling
EL is not neccesarily indicative of quality of a build. Sly had a team about 3 seasons ago that was 100 EL higher than any team in GLB yet they sucked. Sub-500 in Natty Pro. EL can mean a quality build but it is not always the case. Certain plateaus with particular positions, VA's, AE additions, etc all enter into the analysis.
Post the build and you'll likely get a few legit comments smattered in with all the BS ones
Sly's dots had 2 AE I thought
EL and AE combined does tell you if a dot was built well
EL is not neccesarily indicative of quality of a build. Sly had a team about 3 seasons ago that was 100 EL higher than any team in GLB yet they sucked. Sub-500 in Natty Pro. EL can mean a quality build but it is not always the case. Certain plateaus with particular positions, VA's, AE additions, etc all enter into the analysis.
Post the build and you'll likely get a few legit comments smattered in with all the BS ones
Sly's dots had 2 AE I thought
EL and AE combined does tell you if a dot was built well
King of Bling
offline
offline
Unless there is something wrong with my Firefox (It's been acting up today) you have zero % enhancers?
No Fake % or CB%?
If none, that lowers the value of the dot greatly. Should have 1-2 of each...preferably 2 of each. Then 10 on CF, FS, Juke and some on HF to round things out.
Again, even if you have %'s, still missing CF on SA's, which is a glaring omission
No Fake % or CB%?
If none, that lowers the value of the dot greatly. Should have 1-2 of each...preferably 2 of each. Then 10 on CF, FS, Juke and some on HF to round things out.
Again, even if you have %'s, still missing CF on SA's, which is a glaring omission
Edited by King of Bling on Nov 29, 2015 18:05:16
AC
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ahrens858
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4611314
idk but this dot sucks
A hole owner though.
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4611314
idk but this dot sucks
A hole owner though.
Originally posted by AC
A hole owner though.
You better not be talking about boomy!
A hole owner though.
You better not be talking about boomy!
Originally posted by King of Bling
Unless there is something wrong with my Firefox (It's been acting up today) you have zero % enhancers?
No Fake % or CB%?
If none, that lowers the value of the dot greatly. Should have 1-2 of each...preferably 2 of each. Then 10 on CF, FS, Juke and some on HF to round things out.
Again, even if you have %'s, still missing CF on SA's, which is a glaring omission
You taking about EL value or just value of the dot on the dot field?
Unless there is something wrong with my Firefox (It's been acting up today) you have zero % enhancers?
No Fake % or CB%?
If none, that lowers the value of the dot greatly. Should have 1-2 of each...preferably 2 of each. Then 10 on CF, FS, Juke and some on HF to round things out.
Again, even if you have %'s, still missing CF on SA's, which is a glaring omission
You taking about EL value or just value of the dot on the dot field?
Originally posted by Dub ADD
You taking about EL value or just value of the dot on the dot field?
Considering SAs and % modifiers don't affect the EL that should be pretty self evident. Not having those actually raises your EL from what it would have been otherwise, while simultaneously lowering effectiveness on the field.
You taking about EL value or just value of the dot on the dot field?
Considering SAs and % modifiers don't affect the EL that should be pretty self evident. Not having those actually raises your EL from what it would have been otherwise, while simultaneously lowering effectiveness on the field.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
