Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Bort or DD
FatLoad
offline
offline
Jeebuz
offline
offline
I honestly don't even believe Bort exists. He's like Santa. Everyone knows the name, nobody has ever seen him.
LeeRJet
offline
offline
Originally posted by euchrid
He's on Twitter tho
so are 3 different Santa Claus'
https://twitter.com/OfficialSanta
https://twitter.com/santa__claus
https://twitter.com/santaclaus
He's on Twitter tho
so are 3 different Santa Claus'
https://twitter.com/OfficialSanta
https://twitter.com/santa__claus
https://twitter.com/santaclaus
Pwned
offline
offline
Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
we wouldnt fight silly
I'll take Bort based on this comment.
we wouldnt fight silly
I'll take Bort based on this comment.
Dub J
offline
offline
Bort pretty much just posts about WG games while DD just posts a bunch of liberal nonsense and stuff about the Trailblazers.
Dr. E
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
Bort pretty much just posts about WG games while DD just posts a bunch of liberal nonsense and stuff about the Trailblazers.
Liberals, hah. They believe man kind can all work together in a Xanadu, all of us contributing to the well being of everyone. If it were possible, they would be correct in all their desires.
Right wing, like the Founding Fathers, they don't think people can think straight, so they will force them to think correctly.
Libertarians, Like the Liberals, they live in a fantasy where we don't need rules and nobody will victimize others.
Bort pretty much just posts about WG games while DD just posts a bunch of liberal nonsense and stuff about the Trailblazers.
Liberals, hah. They believe man kind can all work together in a Xanadu, all of us contributing to the well being of everyone. If it were possible, they would be correct in all their desires.
Right wing, like the Founding Fathers, they don't think people can think straight, so they will force them to think correctly.
Libertarians, Like the Liberals, they live in a fantasy where we don't need rules and nobody will victimize others.
Catullus16
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dr. E
Liberals, hah. They believe man kind can all work together in a Xanadu, all of us contributing to the well being of everyone. If it were possible, they would be correct in all their desires.
Right wing, like the Founding Fathers, they don't think people can think straight, so they will force them to think correctly.
Libertarians, Like the Liberals, they live in a fantasy where we don't need rules and nobody will victimize others.
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread_list.pl?forum_id=3835
Liberals, hah. They believe man kind can all work together in a Xanadu, all of us contributing to the well being of everyone. If it were possible, they would be correct in all their desires.
Right wing, like the Founding Fathers, they don't think people can think straight, so they will force them to think correctly.
Libertarians, Like the Liberals, they live in a fantasy where we don't need rules and nobody will victimize others.
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread_list.pl?forum_id=3835
dbreeze
offline
offline
Originally posted by Catullus16
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread_list.pl?forum_id=3835
Hell. No wonder no one's here in GLB main..... yer all over there blabbing about pol. & rel.
Originally posted by Dr. E
Liberals, hah. They believe man kind can all work together in a Xanadu, all of us contributing to the well being of everyone. If it were possible, they would be correct in all their desires.
Right wing, like the Founding Fathers, they don't think people can think straight, so they will force them to think correctly.
Libertarians, Like the Liberals, they live in a fantasy where we don't need rules and nobody will victimize others.
Preach on Doc......
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread_list.pl?forum_id=3835
Hell. No wonder no one's here in GLB main..... yer all over there blabbing about pol. & rel.
Originally posted by Dr. E
Liberals, hah. They believe man kind can all work together in a Xanadu, all of us contributing to the well being of everyone. If it were possible, they would be correct in all their desires.
Right wing, like the Founding Fathers, they don't think people can think straight, so they will force them to think correctly.
Libertarians, Like the Liberals, they live in a fantasy where we don't need rules and nobody will victimize others.
Preach on Doc......
Originally posted by Dr. E
Liberals, hah. They believe man kind can all work together in a Xanadu, all of us contributing to the well being of everyone. If it were possible, they would be correct in all their desires.
Right wing, like the Founding Fathers, they don't think people can think straight, so they will force them to think correctly.
Libertarians, Like the Liberals, they live in a fantasy where we don't need rules and nobody will victimize others.
Which is why balance of ideals creates more progress than when any single ideal controls.
Liberals, hah. They believe man kind can all work together in a Xanadu, all of us contributing to the well being of everyone. If it were possible, they would be correct in all their desires.
Right wing, like the Founding Fathers, they don't think people can think straight, so they will force them to think correctly.
Libertarians, Like the Liberals, they live in a fantasy where we don't need rules and nobody will victimize others.
Which is why balance of ideals creates more progress than when any single ideal controls.
Catullus16
offline
offline
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
Which is why balance of ideals creates more progress than when any single ideal controls.
would you call that an ideal balance?
Which is why balance of ideals creates more progress than when any single ideal controls.
would you call that an ideal balance?
Originally posted by Catullus16
would you call that an ideal balance?
Eb and flo is probably a bit better than balanced stagnation. Like a car in a skid... over-correcting is worse than doing nothing... but both lead to crashes. A calm and gentle hand on the wheel knows a touch of turn brings it back into line. But, also, too much of any thing is simply too much... Too much liberalism is not good... too much conservatism is just as bad... too much government is not good... not enough is just as bad. Idiots liberals think the Republicans want a tiny little government and no taxes... plumb stupid. Idiot conservatives think the democrats want a giant government with tons of taxes... also just as stupid. I have plenty of smart republican friends... and democrat friends.. that know the path has, and needs, both ideals to work together. I also know plenty of 'less-than-intelligent' (when it comes to politics, anyways) people... some family... that are so single minded to one ideal, they'd wreck the car if they were driving. Good thing there's enough 'intelligent political minds' out there to keep the country somewhat stable... although, lately, I'm worried there's more dummies than smarties.
would you call that an ideal balance?
Eb and flo is probably a bit better than balanced stagnation. Like a car in a skid... over-correcting is worse than doing nothing... but both lead to crashes. A calm and gentle hand on the wheel knows a touch of turn brings it back into line. But, also, too much of any thing is simply too much... Too much liberalism is not good... too much conservatism is just as bad... too much government is not good... not enough is just as bad. Idiots liberals think the Republicans want a tiny little government and no taxes... plumb stupid. Idiot conservatives think the democrats want a giant government with tons of taxes... also just as stupid. I have plenty of smart republican friends... and democrat friends.. that know the path has, and needs, both ideals to work together. I also know plenty of 'less-than-intelligent' (when it comes to politics, anyways) people... some family... that are so single minded to one ideal, they'd wreck the car if they were driving. Good thing there's enough 'intelligent political minds' out there to keep the country somewhat stable... although, lately, I'm worried there's more dummies than smarties.
Catullus16
offline
offline
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
Eb and flo is probably a bit better than balanced stagnation. Like a car in a skid... over-correcting is worse than doing nothing... but both lead to crashes. A calm and gentle hand on the wheel knows a touch of turn brings it back into line. But, also, too much of any thing is simply too much... Too much liberalism is not good... too much conservatism is just as bad... too much government is not good... not enough is just as bad. Idiots liberals think the Republicans want a tiny little government and no taxes... plumb stupid. Idiot conservatives think the democrats want a giant government with tons of taxes... also just as stupid. I have plenty of smart republican friends... and democrat friends.. that know the path has, and needs, both ideals to work together. I also know plenty of 'less-than-intelligent' (when it comes to politics, anyways) people... some family... that are so single minded to one ideal, they'd wreck the car if they were driving. Good thing there's enough 'intelligent political minds' out there to keep the country somewhat stable... although, lately, I'm worried there's more dummies than smarties.
i'm just wondering what happens when ideal balance is the single ideal that controls.
but yes, you're speaking like a moderate -- which is a reference to the speed/degree of desired change. revolutionaries want to overthrow, radicals want to change at the root (i.e. radix), conservatives want to change slowly, reactionaries want to reverse the change, etc. problem is, most people characterize themselves as moderate, so it's a tough category to pin down. similarly, most people think they're above average, so...
Eb and flo is probably a bit better than balanced stagnation. Like a car in a skid... over-correcting is worse than doing nothing... but both lead to crashes. A calm and gentle hand on the wheel knows a touch of turn brings it back into line. But, also, too much of any thing is simply too much... Too much liberalism is not good... too much conservatism is just as bad... too much government is not good... not enough is just as bad. Idiots liberals think the Republicans want a tiny little government and no taxes... plumb stupid. Idiot conservatives think the democrats want a giant government with tons of taxes... also just as stupid. I have plenty of smart republican friends... and democrat friends.. that know the path has, and needs, both ideals to work together. I also know plenty of 'less-than-intelligent' (when it comes to politics, anyways) people... some family... that are so single minded to one ideal, they'd wreck the car if they were driving. Good thing there's enough 'intelligent political minds' out there to keep the country somewhat stable... although, lately, I'm worried there's more dummies than smarties.
i'm just wondering what happens when ideal balance is the single ideal that controls.
but yes, you're speaking like a moderate -- which is a reference to the speed/degree of desired change. revolutionaries want to overthrow, radicals want to change at the root (i.e. radix), conservatives want to change slowly, reactionaries want to reverse the change, etc. problem is, most people characterize themselves as moderate, so it's a tough category to pin down. similarly, most people think they're above average, so...
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
