Originally posted by MadMustaff
more like 1/4th. get it right son.
more like 1/4th. get it right son.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > How good of an OC is WiSe Ivan?
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by ghuffman
Hate to break it to you Wise, but dots don't carry you to WL championships. They help a ton, but i have seen more teams with incredible rosters fail more often than teams with subpar dots do very well.
This is pretty true. Mine and duro's BEEF dots were some of the least effectively built dots in the game. I think we were near last in that rating the season we lost in the title game. But top 2 in MVP race for running and we just had effective gameplans. Just have to know how to make the best out of what you have.
Hate to break it to you Wise, but dots don't carry you to WL championships. They help a ton, but i have seen more teams with incredible rosters fail more often than teams with subpar dots do very well.
This is pretty true. Mine and duro's BEEF dots were some of the least effectively built dots in the game. I think we were near last in that rating the season we lost in the title game. But top 2 in MVP race for running and we just had effective gameplans. Just have to know how to make the best out of what you have.
Originally posted by RyanCane26
Here's a fact; if you take the next two highest teams from our conference in round 1's screens they don't equal the Hedgehogs.
And though I appreciate your analytics on a regular season where most teams don't even open their AIs I implore you to look at the sole game we're discussing where you threw screens on 18 of 37 attempts (49%).
Not to mention needing an OPT win in w16 to even sniff the playoffs, lol.
isnt the playoffs where you sell out on weaknesses ldo
Here's a fact; if you take the next two highest teams from our conference in round 1's screens they don't equal the Hedgehogs.
And though I appreciate your analytics on a regular season where most teams don't even open their AIs I implore you to look at the sole game we're discussing where you threw screens on 18 of 37 attempts (49%).
Not to mention needing an OPT win in w16 to even sniff the playoffs, lol.
isnt the playoffs where you sell out on weaknesses ldo
Originally posted by bhall43
Having been to 8 ships I can see where you are going wrong wise. Too busy worrying about what other people will think of your gameplans.
bingo
hell 1 of my 2 golds was spamming the FB run, because i knew it'd get 3-4 yards every time and i could then keep the O on the field for a very long time, i remember watching that game hoping I'd only get 4 yards at a time, hoping each drive would take 10 min off the clock
Having been to 8 ships I can see where you are going wrong wise. Too busy worrying about what other people will think of your gameplans.
bingo
hell 1 of my 2 golds was spamming the FB run, because i knew it'd get 3-4 yards every time and i could then keep the O on the field for a very long time, i remember watching that game hoping I'd only get 4 yards at a time, hoping each drive would take 10 min off the clock
Originally posted by bhall43
Naw 3-5. Definitely not the best OC. ghuff and hcreek pwn me and well Valhalla.
Nice, so if we going win % i've got bhall by a MILE!
2-1 LOL
Naw 3-5. Definitely not the best OC. ghuff and hcreek pwn me and well Valhalla.
Nice, so if we going win % i've got bhall by a MILE!
2-1 LOL
bhall43
offline
offline
2 of 3 Lincoln losses were to teams 1000x better built than them. (Valhalla and Blaze)
So I don't even feel remotely bad about those losses as we shouldn't have been in their world to begin with.
So I don't even feel remotely bad about those losses as we shouldn't have been in their world to begin with.
Originally posted by bhall43
2 of 3 Lincoln losses were to teams 1000x better built than them. (Valhalla and Blaze)
So I don't even feel remotely bad about those losses as we shouldn't have been in their world to begin with.
Should have asked wise for some tips
2 of 3 Lincoln losses were to teams 1000x better built than them. (Valhalla and Blaze)
So I don't even feel remotely bad about those losses as we shouldn't have been in their world to begin with.
Should have asked wise for some tips
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by lemdog
Should have asked wise for some tips
I should have done a lot of things, but this was probably not one of them.
Should have asked wise for some tips
I should have done a lot of things, but this was probably not one of them.
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by LeeRJet
i always thought his name was Wise Man
Me too, clearly I can't read lol
i always thought his name was Wise Man
Me too, clearly I can't read lol
WiSeIVIaN
offline
offline
Originally posted by jpjn94
For the few remaining OCs out there WiSe is one of the top. Granted in the prime of this game I remember WiSe always had someone else OC for him.
I OC'd the vast majority of the Hedgehogs seasons. Hired a few people but would always relieve them of their duties in under a season (usually a few games). I had a bit of a complex where I didn't think I was a good enough OC for the Hedgehogs to win, so I was always looking to replace myself. Unfortunately I was never really able to bait a top quality OC, so everyone I hired ended up being a downgrade for me to fire.
Only guy who had some staying power was Luzod, who OC'd maybe ~6-7 seasons for us in the 20's. He was a good guy before he ragequit GLB, but we burned through ~3 WL trips with a shoddy offense. Once I took back over the O things started shaping up a little.
Honestly though, our first several WL trips, our O was pretty good and our D was pretty awful. One could argue that I should have stayed the coarse as OC and both myself and the team would probably have been before for it. It is what it is though.
For the few remaining OCs out there WiSe is one of the top. Granted in the prime of this game I remember WiSe always had someone else OC for him.
I OC'd the vast majority of the Hedgehogs seasons. Hired a few people but would always relieve them of their duties in under a season (usually a few games). I had a bit of a complex where I didn't think I was a good enough OC for the Hedgehogs to win, so I was always looking to replace myself. Unfortunately I was never really able to bait a top quality OC, so everyone I hired ended up being a downgrade for me to fire.
Only guy who had some staying power was Luzod, who OC'd maybe ~6-7 seasons for us in the 20's. He was a good guy before he ragequit GLB, but we burned through ~3 WL trips with a shoddy offense. Once I took back over the O things started shaping up a little.
Honestly though, our first several WL trips, our O was pretty good and our D was pretty awful. One could argue that I should have stayed the coarse as OC and both myself and the team would probably have been before for it. It is what it is though.
WiSeIVIaN
offline
offline
Originally posted by ghuffman
Hate to break it to you Wise, but dots don't carry you to WL championships. They help a ton, but i have seen more teams with incredible rosters fail more often than teams with subpar dots do very well.
The build playing field is much more even now, however I would argue that back during valhalla's run, and the S16 blaze championship, builds were a HUGE advantage.
That blaze squad just smoked teams on talent imo.
Hate to break it to you Wise, but dots don't carry you to WL championships. They help a ton, but i have seen more teams with incredible rosters fail more often than teams with subpar dots do very well.
The build playing field is much more even now, however I would argue that back during valhalla's run, and the S16 blaze championship, builds were a HUGE advantage.
That blaze squad just smoked teams on talent imo.
Originally posted by Robbnva
Me too, clearly I can't read lol
then what is the other "I" for?
wiseivIan.
Me too, clearly I can't read lol
then what is the other "I" for?
wiseivIan.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
