User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Free player limited
Page:
 
TheJohnce
offline
Link
 
What a bunch of shit!!

So we can make a HB but it can't be a free player??

If you click to create a new player, the option to create a HB is available until you click use free player and then it goes away.

Another stupid GLB flex grab and way to drive away people playing this game!!
 
171farm
offline
Link
 
This has been happening forever. Though it sucks from a players perspective, it ensures that the game isnt flooded with glamour players. HB is one of the most popular players to create and if everyone could create a HB with their free player, people would be bitching because there arnt enough human owned teams for all the players. Come to think of it people already do bitch about that so just imagine how much worse it would be if everyone only built HBs. If you create the player quick enough after everyone retires you can luck into using your free player on a HB
 
Link
 
It's not about money. You can almost always make a WR or a QB instead. It's the same cost to them.
Edited by Circus of Dead Squirrels on Oct 9, 2014 06:15:15
 
uoY_redruM
offline
Link
 
Yeah, if I want a premier player with the free slot, I usually make sure I created player as early in the morning as possible when players are being retired.
 
coachingubigr
lounge guy
offline
Link
 
 
LeeRJet
offline
Link
 
having never made a HB, i was unaware of this until recently.
no wonder people think i'm a noob.
 
Raiders12
offline
Link
 
He does have a point though.

If you are dumb enough to make a HB without already having a team to put him on, then you really have no reason to be crying about it.

There isn't any reason to have the restriction that makes it some kind of contest to see who can get on first after roll-over to make one.

Besides, they are free. If you make one and can't find a team, there is always the D leagues, or CPU teams. or retirement.

Let them cry!
 
Guppy, Inc
offline
Link
 
having free players on cpu teams does nothing to help the game. we are lucky that the glamor players are ever free, being that they are what brings in the money and there's a lack of players at just about every other position.
 
LeeRJet
offline
Link
 
WR shouldn't be "glamor" players since most of the passes go to the HB or TE
i want a refund on my free player!
 
TheJohnce
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
having free players on cpu teams does nothing to help the game. we are lucky that the glamor players are ever free, being that they are what brings in the money and there's a lack of players at just about every other position.


But that's the flex grab point.

If they aren't free, then fine. So be it.

But if they are, then there shouldn't be a limitation on them. Just make a note when ever one is created as a free player that if they aren't on a team by day 48, then are automatically retired. This would take care of the glut of them built and no one should have a reason to cry about it since they were told up front when the player was created what the deal is.
 
sunder B
offline
Link
 
It's not about a flex grab, it is about balancing the rosters for competitive teams.

Every agent in GLB having a HB on a CPU team just because they are free would be plain stupid.
 
Bane
Baconologist
offline
Link
 
You got told up front that positions in low demand can not be created with the free player slot

Quit crying. It's free
 
Link
 
Originally posted by sunder B
It's not about a flex grab, it is about balancing the rosters for competitive teams.

Every agent in GLB having a HB on a CPU team just because they are free would be plain stupid.


Originally posted by Bane
You got told up front that positions in low demand can not be created with the free player slot

Quit crying. It's free



/thread
 
tvhs96
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by LeeRJet
WR shouldn't be "glamor" players since most of the passes go to the HB or TE
i want a refund on my free player!


If you create a good WR, teams will get them the ball. It may not be until Level 79, but they'll start getting the ball.
 
greengoose
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TheJohnce
But that's the flex grab point.

If they aren't free, then fine. So be it.

But if they are, then there shouldn't be a limitation on them. Just make a note when ever one is created as a free player that if they aren't on a team by day 48, then are automatically retired. This would take care of the glut of them built and no one should have a reason to cry about it since they were told up front when the player was created what the deal is.


But people are told up front right now what the deal is, and they still complain. Can you imagine the complaints when 2,000 Free HB's get deleted on Day 48, and they don't find out about it till Day -8 of the following season - and miss out on their Season 0 boosts with any replacement player the make after the fact? Free boosts at that?
Edited by greengoose on Oct 9, 2014 10:00:20
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.