User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Stats on GLB classic and GLB2
Page:
 
chief c
offline
Link
 
446,858 users (both games)

GLB

36,000 Players age 1 - 480 days old (w/active agents within the last 3 days)
569 regular human owned teams
295 casual human owned teams
45 pee wee human owned teams
909 total GLB1 human owned teams

GLB2
27,200 Players approximately? (13,000 free agents + 14,200 active roster spots)
330 human owned teams (43 roster spots per team)

------------------------------ ------------------------------

Since the search features are different from GLB to GLB2:
- unable to determine # of active agents in either game.
- unable to determine exact # of human owned dots in GLB2.

Tallies, while close, aren't exact:
- teams are bought and sold every day.
- agents may/may not be more likely to be inactive on d.48.
- I could easily have screwed up the count on all the CPU teams.

Bort and company likely have a SS with the exact numbers. But I'd venture to say his numbers are pretty darn close to these.

Interesting though that GLB2 has roughly the same number of teams as GLB1's Casual and Pee Wee combined.
 
psi
fur eel
offline
Link
 
3 words or less goddamn
 
Link
 
yeah my aim is to be a career free agent in GLB2
 
aaasahi
offline
Link
 
How do you make such data?
Search one by one?!
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
The comparisons are stupid at this point. GLB2 hasn't reached its highest league. Nobody really knows how that league is gonna play out. For all we know everyone kicks rocks when they figure that out. Or they like it and recycle to get into that league. It is all about how that league plays out.

GLB1 is obviously on its last leg. GLB2 can't be on its last leg because its still changing. That being said it can get to a point where nothing is keeping the venture going. Which I can't see happening before other games roll in and keep people interested as a side bar. At that point it will be interesting how things play out. Who is working on what and will it be worth investing? I will stick around until that development. GLB1 I already see is fucking donezo.,
 
Dub J
offline
Link
 
Think I have a player at GLB2. Haven't even looked over there in I don't know when.

 
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
The comparisons are stupid at this point. GLB2 hasn't reached its highest league. Nobody really knows how that league is gonna play out. For all we know everyone kicks rocks when they figure that out. Or they like it and recycle to get into that league. It is all about how that league plays out.

GLB1 is obviously on its last leg. GLB2 can't be on its last leg because its still changing. That being said it can get to a point where nothing is keeping the venture going. Which I can't see happening before other games roll in and keep people interested as a side bar. At that point it will be interesting how things play out. Who is working on what and will it be worth investing? I will stick around until that development. GLB1 I already see is fucking donezo.,


well didnt it take most it's userbase from an already declining GLB1 or do they actually get anyone from their ads?
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Timetoshine-Metta
well didnt it take most it's userbase from an already declining GLB1 or do they actually get anyone from their ads?


I dunno there are a lot of people I don't recognize from this game though. Probably a bunch of multis.
 
lemdog
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
The comparisons are stupid at this point. GLB2 hasn't reached its highest league. Nobody really knows how that league is gonna play out. For all we know everyone kicks rocks when they figure that out. Or they like it and recycle to get into that league. It is all about how that league plays out.

GLB1 is obviously on its last leg. GLB2 can't be on its last leg because its still changing. That being said it can get to a point where nothing is keeping the venture going. Which I can't see happening before other games roll in and keep people interested as a side bar. At that point it will be interesting how things play out. Who is working on what and will it be worth investing? I will stick around until that development. GLB1 I already see is fucking donezo.,



Glb 2 was dead within a week. It can go through changes but one would think they would have at least made it better then the original version and that's just not the case.
 
chief c
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by aaasahi
How do you make such data?
Search one by one?!


The GLB1 player data was simple. You just do a player search with no names entered with the only factor being active agents and less than 480 days old and you come up with hundreds of pages which you multiply by 25 (listings per page) and you get roughly 35,000 dots. Though to get the number of human owned teams you do have to count each CPU team by hand.

Originally posted by bhall43
The comparisons are worthless at this point. GLB2 hasn't reached its highest league. Nobody really knows how that league is gonna play out. ................ It is all about how that league plays out.


I agree. Even if the numbers are 100% dead on, comparisons aren't worth much at this stage.
I disagree however about GLB1 being "donezo". It may be headed that way but right now the casual game looks stabilized and the regular regional pro league looks solid with 150 human owned teams.

 
Moretti
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by chief c
I agree. Even if the numbers are 100% dead on, comparisons aren't worth much at this stage.
I disagree however about GLB1 being "donezo". It may be headed that way but right now the casual game looks stabilized and the regular regional pro league looks solid with 150 human owned teams.



not sure why regional pro looks solid with a bunch of empty "human owned" teams.

in most age groups there is only one league...some have cpu teams...many teams arent full....

we will probably only be able to have two nat pro leagues shortly we consider continued attrition as well as the lack of created players over the past several seasons
 
Dub J
offline
Link
 
It is pretty silly to keep the same amt of Pro teams along with WL at this point.

 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by chief c
I agree. Even if the numbers are 100% dead on, comparisons aren't worth much at this stage.
I disagree however about GLB1 being "donezo". It may be headed that way but right now the casual game looks stabilized and the regular regional pro league looks solid with 150 human owned teams.



Casual has less leagues than regular. And like Moretti said, all those regional pro teams are a bunch of CPU's.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by lemdog

Glb 2 was dead within a week. It can go through changes but one would think they would have at least made it better then the original version and that's just not the case.


Maybe, though all the leagues still are competitive at least.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
Maybe, though all the leagues still are competitive at least.


cuz everyone scores like 7-10 points and fumble about 8 times a game
Edited by Timetoshine-Metta on Jun 24, 2014 15:43:44
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.