User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Should there really be any "low" demand positions at this point?
Page:
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by BadBuc99
Technically, most use their free dots on the higher cost positions in general, so you'd have to include WR in there too.


But wr is whatever. You can have 6 of those on a team and be fine.
 
Savitar
Ghost Recon
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
But wr is whatever. You can have 6 of those on a team and be fine.


Point is, they are a high cost position.

I do doubt that having 6 on a team will be fine, unless you like getting nasty PM's for disgruntled owners. Actually, 3 WR's on a team is fine.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by BadBuc99
Point is, they are a high cost position.

I do doubt that having 6 on a team will be fine, unless you like getting nasty PM's for disgruntled owners. Actually, 3 WR's on a team is fine.


uh well 6 WR's be like the equivalent of 3 HBs
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by BadBuc99
Point is, they are a high cost position.

I do doubt that having 6 on a team will be fine, unless you like getting nasty PM's for disgruntled owners. Actually, 3 WR's on a team is fine.




Originally posted by Timetoshine-Metta
uh well 6 WR's be like the equivalent of 3 HBs


Edited by bhall43 on Jun 23, 2014 23:54:08
 
Link
 
Only 2 rookie leagues and the 2nd is cpu--this might be the last season?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.