Since people have left the game in droves and continue to, it just doesn't make any sense at all that we still have players listed as "low demand". Since we need literally twice the number of dots across the game as we have........ shouldn't logic dictate that ALL dots are in high demand?
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Should there really be any "low" demand positions at this point?
Moretti
offline
offline
has it ever been explained how its caculated?
the create a position page indicates that running back is at low demand at 2.76 per team. It indicates that there are 2547 hbs already active. So about 933 teams? Does that include pee wee teams, cpu rostered human teams, cpu owner teams? If so why?
Not sure why 2.76 is considered low either. My team has a scat back, power back, elusive back and hb that is a kr/pr. I would say at best 3 hbs on a team should be considered "average."
My guess would be that those classifications were done in the most basic and least time consuming manor. They really are not indicative of anything more than a vary broad and not very accurate determination for relative player demand.
the create a position page indicates that running back is at low demand at 2.76 per team. It indicates that there are 2547 hbs already active. So about 933 teams? Does that include pee wee teams, cpu rostered human teams, cpu owner teams? If so why?
Not sure why 2.76 is considered low either. My team has a scat back, power back, elusive back and hb that is a kr/pr. I would say at best 3 hbs on a team should be considered "average."
My guess would be that those classifications were done in the most basic and least time consuming manor. They really are not indicative of anything more than a vary broad and not very accurate determination for relative player demand.
F8n4tune
offline
offline
Take a look at all the cpu owned teams in this game , the answer is...............................NO
And to piggyback that whether there is a need for them or not you should be able to make one if you can pay for it. Whether it plays or not isn't the issue. Rookie leagues are full of cpu teams and you can put a low demand dot on a D League team if you really wanted one.
Bottom line is there never ever should have been a cap on what a paying customer wants to build even when the game was popping there was always teams with spots on them. Just one of the many things not taken into consideration and then when noticed was never changed.
And to piggyback that whether there is a need for them or not you should be able to make one if you can pay for it. Whether it plays or not isn't the issue. Rookie leagues are full of cpu teams and you can put a low demand dot on a D League team if you really wanted one.
Bottom line is there never ever should have been a cap on what a paying customer wants to build even when the game was popping there was always teams with spots on them. Just one of the many things not taken into consideration and then when noticed was never changed.
Originally posted by coachingubigr
Your mom is in high demand
Or " De man is in your high mom."
Your mom is in high demand
Or " De man is in your high mom."
if people were able to make QBs with their free player, we would have to play QBs at WR
Originally posted by Dub J
Did they ever change the TEs demand after 2 TE sets were added?
Since the accept screen still warns you when there are two TEs, I would guess not.
Did they ever change the TEs demand after 2 TE sets were added?
Since the accept screen still warns you when there are two TEs, I would guess not.
We_Rule
offline
offline
3 HBs on a team should prb be "average"....... eHB, pHB, and returner. Or am I looking at this wrong.
Originally posted by F8n4tune
Take a look at all the cpu owned teams in this game , the answer is...............................NO
And to piggyback that whether there is a need for them or not you should be able to make one if you can pay for it. Whether it plays or not isn't the issue. Rookie leagues are full of cpu teams and you can put a low demand dot on a D League team if you really wanted one.
Bottom line is there never ever should have been a cap on what a paying customer wants to build even when the game was popping there was always teams with spots on them. Just one of the many things not taken into consideration and then when noticed was never changed.
When did they ever stop anyone from building a dot at any position with flex?
OP is talking about the free player slot
If somebody wants to spend the flex and build 50000000000 HB's I doubt Bort is gonna stop them
Take a look at all the cpu owned teams in this game , the answer is...............................NO
And to piggyback that whether there is a need for them or not you should be able to make one if you can pay for it. Whether it plays or not isn't the issue. Rookie leagues are full of cpu teams and you can put a low demand dot on a D League team if you really wanted one.
Bottom line is there never ever should have been a cap on what a paying customer wants to build even when the game was popping there was always teams with spots on them. Just one of the many things not taken into consideration and then when noticed was never changed.
When did they ever stop anyone from building a dot at any position with flex?
OP is talking about the free player slot
If somebody wants to spend the flex and build 50000000000 HB's I doubt Bort is gonna stop them
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
