Owners go
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > If CPU dots were as good back when cash was useful, as they are now, would you have recruited as hard and spent as much cash as you did back then??
I have not recruited more than 2 dots in a season in a good 12 seasons.
So yes
So yes
Achelon
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dr. E
is this another one of those threads by a guy who gets beat by CPU Dots?
Does it look like it?
is this another one of those threads by a guy who gets beat by CPU Dots?
Does it look like it?
Achelon
offline
offline
Where in the question does it even hint at that? And when have I ever complained about CPU dot's? The question is, since you guys are obviously not smart enough to understand,
CPU dots are better now, than they were back when cash actually meant something. When cash meant something, owners would trade shitty player to new owners for too much cash.
If CPU dots were as good back than as they are now, which they are 10 times better than they were, would owners abuse the cash system as much as they did. When they could have just signed cheap cpu dots, instead of signing a player and trading for more than he was worth three days later.
CPU dots are better now, than they were back when cash actually meant something. When cash meant something, owners would trade shitty player to new owners for too much cash.
If CPU dots were as good back than as they are now, which they are 10 times better than they were, would owners abuse the cash system as much as they did. When they could have just signed cheap cpu dots, instead of signing a player and trading for more than he was worth three days later.
yendorii
offline
offline
I understand the question, I just don't get the point of asking. Why does the answer matter to anything?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
