Warrior General Games

Spaniard Kings and Roma have a sexy EL, but must suck at gameplanning or something.

London is 5-0 with some serious 0 care levels. We also suck at throwing and running with the ball.

Porto are 0-5. But I guess things are looking up and a loss in OT to Rain shows that.

San Antonio won a game

My KR isnt leading the MVP charts in Zeta

jpjn94 is serioulsly slacking on his usual awesome threads. WEPL is poorer for it.

I'll go with...

- DLs leading the sacks leader boards, its been about 20 seasons since that happened... its like the days of Jimmy Johnson, Tank Davis, Tokey McBong, Crush Grove and Marcus Strong for those who can remember that far back

Originally posted by Mike Rogers
I'll go with...

- DLs leading the sacks leader boards, its been about 20 seasons since that happened... its like the days of Jimmy Johnson, Tank Davis, Tokey McBong, Crush Grove and Marcus Strong for those who can remember that far back

?
The top 5 in blowout adjusted sacks are 3 LB's and 2 CB's.


Originally posted by ricksta1975
Spaniard Kings and Roma have a sexy EL, but must suck at gameplanning or something.


The GLB elitist over rate EL's and team skill point values on a regular basis. I'm not saying it's not important, I'm just saying its overrated.

Originally posted by AC
The GLB elitist over rate EL's and team skill point values on a regular basis. I'm not saying it's not important, I'm just saying its overrated.



Shhhhhh, don't tell them

Originally posted by AC
The GLB elitist over rate EL's and team skill point values on a regular basis. I'm not saying it's not important, I'm just saying its overrated.



ELs are fine but unless they open their builds we cant determine much of anything as to what they should be doing....who knows maybe they have no SA's?

Originally posted by AC
The GLB elitist over rate EL's and team skill point values on a regular basis. I'm not saying it's not important, I'm just saying its overrated.



Because if there are 2 good builds and one has more SP's, the one with more SP's is better ldo.

We can't account for bad VA and Coordinating.

Maybe. what if those extra SPs are invested in a useless attribute? Again, im not saying they are BS, im only saying they are over rated by most.

Originally posted by AC
Maybe. what if those extra SPs are invested in a useless attribute? Again, im not saying they are BS, im only saying they are over rated by most.

Odds are that isn't the case. Especially if it is a team in which the "elitists" are saying are pretty good.

I guess you consider yourself an elitist. Congrats.

Originally posted by AC
I guess you consider yourself an elitist. Congrats.

You were the one who mentioned elitists. And I didn't say anything to point at myself as one. But congrats on taking that from nothing. >_<

Originally posted by AC
Originally posted by Mike Rogers

I'll go with...

- DLs leading the sacks leader boards, its been about 20 seasons since that happened... its like the days of Jimmy Johnson, Tank Davis, Tokey McBong, Crush Grove and Marcus Strong for those who can remember that far back

?
The top 5 in blowout adjusted sacks are 3 LB's and 2 CB's.




And the next 5 are DEs, so the top ten adjusted is 50% DEs, 30% LB, and 20% CBs

But Blowout adjusted after 5 games is incredbly lol... its even worse than the inbalance of Raw stats.

And what bhall is trying to say (badly) is that when elites talk about Eff Level, they are normally talking about teams that have already proven to be elite.

If you got to WL, AND you have a 1400 eff level, then yeah you should be better than a WL team with a 1300 Eff level.

Kings were 10-6 last season, and lost a close game to RHCP in the playoffs, when they were still young.
All the 6 games they lost were close, and they improved a lot in the second half of the season only losing once, to Monarchs.

Given that, I agree with Ricksta they should be doing a lot better, even with 0 cares.

Originally posted by bhall43
Odds are that isn't the case. Especially if it is a team in which the "elitists" are saying are pretty good.

"elitist" bhall and his dots are 0-5 in WL

Case Closed

Originally posted by IIAMLEGEND
"elitist" bhall and his dots are 0-5 in WL

Case Closed

only 4 more losses and I can safely make 100 threads about a WL playoff team sucking.

Originally posted by Mike Rogers
And the next 5 are DEs, so the top ten adjusted is 50% DEs, 30% LB, and 20% CBs

But Blowout adjusted after 5 games is incredbly lol... its even worse than the inbalance of Raw stats.


Gotcha.