User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Q&A Archives > Team Demotion/Resets Rules Discussion - Summary
turnit643
offline
Link
 
Summary from "Team Demotion/Resets Rules" thread: http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3800320
(*through page 27)
(*second post with quotes from pages 28-ish to 90)
(*third post with quotes to page 111)

Announcement: http://goallineblitz.com/game/announcement.pl?id=314

Updated Promotion / Demotion FAQ: http://goallineblitz.com/demotion_faq.html

Related discussion from test server "Idea for equipment/$ fix" - http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3789390

Among updates to "Current Projects" in changelog: "- Figure out and work on new equipment and team facility system"



▬▬▬

WHO? WHEN?

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by Melchisedec
So since it's not before season 15, if I demote this season, I'll be alright?

No. These rules are effective immediately. Stadium/Fan Support Deterioration will not start happening until season 15 however.

Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by AirMcMVP
Originally posted by Ryiotgear

[...]sucks for all the teams that are resetting next season for archtype players

The new rules don't go into effect until Season 15...don't think it will affect teams dropping down to take advantage of archetypes.

The new rules for stadium/fan support deterioration don't go into effect until Season 15. Teams that request demotion for season 15 WILL have their stadium and cash reset to the level they are moving to (unless moving to AA).

Yeah, this. Everyone (specially since there will be plenty of new archetype teams) should start on the same page.
Also, as a bonus, this rule will allow teams who got in over their head (new owners usually) a way to reset, start over with some new money, and get it right.

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by SawyerReywas

So none of this will affect any teams that dropped cap prior to this announcement with a full stadium and money in the bank in any way?

No, it won't be applied retroactively.
Originally posted by Bort

No, it will not (except for maybe the stadium decay rules). It would be pretty hard to sort out who's who, even if we wanted to do something to existing teams.

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by seirus

So if i dropped down to Level 14 this past season, have a full stadium, and will have a competitive roster in season 15, does my stadium start deterioiating in the offseason or the off season inbetween season 15-16. Just trying to figure out how many sections i will end up having to rebuild.

Deterioration only takes place if 1) you don't have 30 human players on your roster or 2) your team doesn't meet the minimum level requirements. This is determined during weeks 14-16 of the regular season by seeing if your team did not receive media revenue (which is received if you meet the above two criteria) those three weeks.
If you have a competitive roster in season 15 and are not requesting a demotion, these changes should not impact you.

▬▬▬

CLARIFICATION

Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by reddogrw

[...]So what is the rule - I need 30 human players at the min level for that league or I need enough to qualify for media revenue?

Same minimums for media revenue, already in use.

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by reddogrw

[...]in today's announcement the rule just stated 30 human players above level 36 (the minimum signing level for the uncapped leagues), but then you just said media revenue is the way to determine this so which is it?

It doesnt say 30 human players above level 36 - it's 30 human players or meeting the median level requirements for the level they are at (this varies depending on what level you are at).

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by reddogrw

[...]so does my team need to:
1 - Have 30 human players on the team - see bolded part (obviously they must be above the existing min level to sign or have been on the team)
OR
2 - Meet the requirements to earn media money
please clarify

They are one and the same. The media requirements = the announcement requirements. We spelled it out to make it more clear for people rather than just saying "you must get media revenue for the last three weeks"

▬▬▬

LOOPHOLE?

Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by pottsman
Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by pottsman

I see an exploit that might need to get closed up...
Teams "overpromoting". For example, the "we won too many games and got moved up 2 caps to level 22 when my team is only level 17 on average, please demote us to 18 cap" people. Who do get moved down sometimes. If they know that that they are going to do this, and they have a good amount of cash in the bank...what's to stop them from giving all the players big bonuses in the last few days of the season, then demoting and having all the cash back?

If the EQ changes like discussed, they wouldn't really get anything out of it, since their stadium would get reset.

If cash has any use, then they will.

In the proposed new system, the player doesn't accumulate cash, since it is worthless to him. His salary amount is used to determine any effects on his morale. Since the cash then doesn't travel with the player, the team gets no benefit from loading him up.

Originally posted by Catch22

We can clarify the demotion requests to not allow those in instances where teams have done that - we review every demotion request manually, so we can review their team cash history and see if they have done something like that. Pretty easy to catch tbh.

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by gbnk82

i belive what he i saying is say say a team is below there level and have 100+mill saved up..Whats to say they dont just give that cash to there players before they demote they then still technically have the money

If you demote, the players don't go with you. If you give all the money to the players to go to another team, that violates the cash farm rules and will be punished. If they want to give all their money to players who are going to many teams before they demote, that won't really be feasible once Bort implements the new EQ system.

Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by reddogrw

which is why all these changes need to go in at one time together

I agree, but we'll do what we can. Better to let people know it is coming now than tell them 2 days before they're getting demoted.

▬▬▬

EQUIPMENT / FINANCES

Originally posted by moepoker
Please make it harder for teams to buy equipment next.
Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by moepoker

Please make it free for players to buy equipment an add more team upgrade type stuff next.

fyp with most likely scenario

Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by OBFuSCaTe

Excellent change.
Can't wait to see the EQ fix.

The system we are currently working on figuring out, proposed by a tester, and similar to some other ideas in suggestions revolves around the concept of removing the team->player money transfer via equipment, since that's the main thing collusion is based on, and instead have players directly pay for their EQ with the currency they have, and teams pay for more team-related options.

Think of it this way:
- Players have currency already: time, tokens, SP, morale, energy. Make eq and training cost based on that instead, and let players get EQ more easily. Players then are more in control of their destiny, instead of relying on a team, and have all the same options. The only thing salary really should do for them is keep their morale up and maybe buy some bling.
- Teams have cash as their currency. Let them use that to upgrade their facilities, advertise, and pay their players to play (not to make them vastly better via EQ).

It's a fairly major change from what we have now, but I have grown to really like the idea and I think doing things along those lines would really clean up the whole mess and make it more fun for everyone. We're trying to work out the numbers and the ideas on things to add, etc, currently.

Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by wombat killer

Bort - you probably should have made some mention of the equipment change you are thinking about in the announcement or make another announcement.

Not anywhere near official, yet, tho. Might run into issues by the time we get to working through it all, etc.
It's pretty much the primary idea right now, though. We need to fix up the system in general somehow. It's just not very fun in the end.

Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by OBFuSCaTe

[...]It will be very nice that teams finally have a chance to use their money for something of substance as opposed to EQ that can "leave" the team. One thing I hope does change with this new finance implementation is a more in depth finances page. If teams have more control over their money, let them also have a finance page that represents that control. Being able to view which section of seats were purchased, at how much. Which stadium construction, facilities, etc etc...

Good point on the finances page. Might be a good chance to revamp ticket/concession sales to work more realistically.

▬▬▬

COMMENTS

Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by StiffarmSteve

Its going to be an interesting season 15 (and off season). I have a feeling a lot of teams are going CPU and a lot of free agent dots on the market at the lower levels.
Whew...

Yeah, though I don't mind having less teams/leagues in minors if they are mostly full of teams who are trying as opposed to cash farms and gutted "holding on to my cash" teams.
I think if we do this and fix the way equipment works (like I mentioned) it will go a long way to getting rid of a lot of the colluding and "rule-working" that goes on right now. That sort of stuff sounds like it doesn't affect anyone to the person who is doing it, but it really disenfranchises a lot of newer owners to see gutted teams in their league with $200M.

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by Shayde

So the goal here is for us all to quit, right?
Just making sure.. that's the message I'm getting with the archetypes and the team destruction.
If it isn't, please enlighten.

Of course that's not the goal - the goal is to give every one a better experience. There are a lot of things that needed adjusted. ALG's and player development was one. Getting teams on a more level playing field was another. Anyone who thinks these changes are here to screw the average GLB user isn't looking at the big picture and is most likely looking at how it only impacts them personally.

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by Bukowski
Originally posted by SCACE
Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by Shayde

Honestly.. I'll take all my cash and throw it out the window, but the STADIUM??!?!?!!?
I worked long and hard building it, sacrificed my own players to help build sections, and now I have to tear it all down?
Reprehensible.

And you don't see how having a full stadium is an inherent and huge advantage over other teams that are starting from scratch?

And you don't see how teams that already demoted and have a full stadium AND their cash is a huge advantage over other teams that are starting from scratch?

But it wasn't a rule back then.
You can't retroactively punish teams for something that wasn't even against the rules.
The farm team exploit was one thing, because that was actually against the rules, and even then they said that they're only going to use the most severe examples. This never was against the rules, so it would be pretty messed up to punish teams over something that wasn't wrong at the time.

I do but I also know it's not as easy as you think it is to figure out which teams to reset and which ones to not reset. It's also not my call on that one as it's Bort who would have to do all the work.
Edit to add - also what Bukowski said. It wasn't against the rules then so it'd be hard to punish someone for doing something that wasn't disallowed.
Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc

its grandfathering that has caused so many exploits in the past. grandfathering teams with this will just cause people to look for exploits in attempts to level the playing field

people have been looking for exploits since season 1, day 1. no matter what we change/fix people will still look for exploits.
Originally posted by Bort

If you want to drop down and start over, competing with teams who have not had the same amount of time as you to gain that advantage, then yes.

Think about the perspective of a younger owner for a minute. You just finished 2 corners on your stadium, and have a nice bankroll of $8M in lv 22. You're feeling like you did pretty well, you're geared up to pay for your players and probably bring in some new recruits with some good signing bonuses. Then you look at the other teams in your league. One of them has $180M and a full stadium. You don't know him or his motivations, but you know he can easily poach all your recruits, fully equip all his players, and he has an advantage over you. You look at his history and see he played in a Pro league last season. Does this inspire you to continue playing, or does it make you say "this is dumb, I quit?" According to many people in our survey, it makes them not want to try at all.

Think about it. It's not just stadium sections. It's free cash. You don't have to pay for those sections again. That's an extra $20-30M you get free and clear over the other guy.

If the premise of your argument is simply "but it removes MY advantage specifically, but makes the playing field more level for everyone else" then you're actually arguing FOR the change. You want to start over? You start over.

Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by Shayde

We worked hard to build this. So you're saying those in it from the beginning don't deserve a slight advantage? People who have tested, and worked, and PAID for this suddenly have to lose everything?

If they are giving up and starting over, yes.
You don't get free SP for making a new player just because your old player retired. You start with 15 like everyone else.

Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by Shayde

Just to placate noobs? Let them out in all the work to get where I am. We've already run the marathon and you're putting them on the last 20 yards and are saying GO. Should there not be some payoff for all our hard work?

No, you're wanting to run a marathon against less experienced players and start yourself at the last 20 yards. Seriously, think about it from outside your own team bubble. You're mad that your stadium is going away if you decide to go it at a lower level. The 31 other owners in the league are mad that you're coming into their playground with a head start.

Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by SCACE

The irony in this Bort is that you realize there is a problem, you guys have come up with a way to deal with it, but you refuse to apply to everyone equally.
When you make a major change like this, go full bore. If you want teams at every level to be on an even playing field to start under the new rules, reset all cash and stadiums to the presets listed earlier and let everyone compete on that playing field.
Only doing so for future demotions still leaves countless teams with maxed stadiums and massive war chests in the lower levels and sadly those teams will maintain that advantage while others (under the new rules) aren't able to exploit the system like they did.
I'm not at all saying don't implement the rule -- I think its way past due -- but it unfortunately doesn't cover everyone and that is a problem.

I understand, and it's sucky, but I feel like I can't in good conscience start resetting everyone's teams based on a brand new rule. We debated on adding the rule, hemmed and hawed, and that's our fault, not the owners'.
Some people are already annoyed by the new rule, even with warning. Retroactively enforcing it is not something they're going to stand for IMO.
Over time, those teams will weed out as they demote again or promote back to the higher ranks where it doesn't matter as much.

▬▬▬

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by Dub J

This discussion has become stagnant anyway.

Yep, heading to bed. Pretty much what we expected - most people approve, those that don't have their reasons (not saying they are wrong either). In the long run though, this change is good for GLB. We'll never be able to please every one - we just need to do what's best for the long term future of the game and stick to it.
G'nite guys!

Edited by turnit643 on Feb 25, 2010 16:26:21
Edited by turnit643 on Feb 24, 2010 15:28:10
 
turnit643
offline
Link
 
Adding some quotes from pages 28-ish to 90 ...

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
Originally posted by foofighter24

Some thoughts:
1. Something had to be done because there is too much money in the GLB economy, and teams dropping down with full stadiums are a big problem
2. An issue with this particular fix is that it gives another huge advanatage to entrenched tems that have already taken advantage of such tactics
3. The in-game money causes far more trouble than it is worth. It adds nothing but headaches in its current form
4. Was a system that would create more parity, such as a salary cap system considered? It has successfully created parity in real sports. If we give the players a reason to desire money, I think it could be the most effective system.

we are currently working on in-game economy changes, equipment, etc. can't go into detail just yet, but we agree that a change/fix is needed

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
Originally posted by rellascout

Digital please answer this question. Seems like if you fix how GLB money works in terms of EQ then this change is meaningless.

this change helps, and the other changes will help too.

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
Originally posted by tsherr

It wouldn't really be a split of versions. The same software would run on both machines (I know there may be more than one server now, but let's keep it simple) but on the new "reset" server, everyone who joined would join at the same time and create players at the same time, thus giving the feeling of a "fresh" version without irritating anyone. But thinking about it, you'd pretty much have to lock that server so that no newer players could join to keep the competition level equal - so it'd have to be enough players to make the extra server worth it. Not sure how that would work.

it would be splitting our userbase. which we won't do.
i got your point, and understand your reasoning.
we are focused on fixing things, and keeping everyone together

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
Originally posted by jdpbernal

How about when GLB gets out of its current Beta version?

i still don't think we will do a wipe at that point.

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
we aren't splitting the userbase into multiple servers/versions of GLB

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
We feel most of the players in the game would get screwed with a total wipe, and we aren't going to do that to them.

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
ITT: people try to push for a total wipe because we are making a change
FYI: A total wipe won't happen. Ever.

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
Originally posted by 5STAR

anyway we can combine this with team owned equipment instead of player owned? You then pay a maintenance fee for each piece of equipment depending on what level it is?

team-owned equipment is something we have discussed. tweaking how money is used on equipment is another thing we have talked about. changes are coming on equipment cost.

Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
Originally posted by jdpbernal

I'm curious... I read somewhere in this 90 pages of this thread that there's some change with regards on how equipment is purchase or used or something like that.... What changes would they be? Cheaper cost of EQ?

can't go into the details right now, but yes. we are changing equipment setup.


Edited by turnit643 on Feb 24, 2010 15:36:26
Edited by turnit643 on Feb 24, 2010 15:35:31
 
turnit643
offline
Link
 
More comments from Catch22 in the later pages (through page 111)

Originally posted by Catch22
we're making a lot of changes right now but it's with the games long term stability and future in mind. Should some of these things have been addressed sooner? Absolutely. But it's better to fix it then to continue to let the game operate inefficiently and with exploitable systems.

Originally posted by Catch22
We can't really retroactively take money from teams for doing something that wasn't against the rules though. Eventually over the course of 5-10 seasons, these rules will have every one on a level playing field. We're definitely not screwing the next 3 seasons of teams. If anything, we're making it so a new team owner in Cap 14 is competing against other teams that do not have an unfair monetary advantage.
If you want to leave the game because of this decision, that's your right, but this change is for the long term benefit of all of GLB.

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by Team Nucleus

There is no long term benefit if your losing your steady veteran members and owners. o_O

We're definitely not losing all of our steady veteran members and owners. For every one person who is complaining about this change, there are five who are in favor of it. The loudest people will always be the ones who don't like something.

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by Pantone

The bottom line with all of this is communication. There was no input from owners, just a decision made the admin, but if you are going to completely change the service I signed up for and spent real dollars on, then I should either have the option to cancel my service and be refunded my remaining money (flex dollars) or I should have a say In what happens, simple contract negotiation fellas.

I don't disagree that changes are needs, but I think the majority are right and a complete reboot is needed. It wont happen because with the abundance of flex dollars people will have, no one will buy anymore=Bort makes no $$$$$. These changes aren't about making the game better, it's a band aid fix for now.

The system IS flawed and the flaws continue to create massive changes every off-season, so why not do the sart thing and reboot everything, upload the changes, post a new rulebook and provide the customer service that SHOULD be your top priority. IMO the time spent on this game by all the owners is deserving of a permanent fix. You have had 14 seasons to figure things out., so lets get it figured out and reset it, so we can all get back to having fun.

I'm not against the changes, I think they could make it a better game, but why cause a huge uproar, just reset and let it be, those who want to stay will stay and those who want to leave will leave...

I will get grilled for this post, but then again, when someone doesn't agree they tear you down. And all the people who represent GLB, should act professional and treat the customer w respect. Even if it was humourous, if you worked for a company and someone took it the wrong way, you would have your ass canned. Just a thought!


I'm not saying you don't have a right to voice your concerns or frustrations. It's why this forum exists and why threads like these are allowed to take place.

A full reset simply isn't going to happen - there are just too many logistical issues not to mention it's not something that would receive universal support - it'd probably be 50-50 and we can't alienate half a customer base like that. We simply have to do what we can to improve the current game as best we possibly can.

As for a flex refund, I think any business would tell you that's not only not going to happen but it's not realistic. That's like asking Blizzard to refund you the $150 you paid in monthly subscription fees you paid for the last year because all of a sudden they nerfed your over powered Ranger pet abilities.

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by SawyerReywas

A restart is very feasible
Flex is usable on both
You can play on both

Current server GLB Beta 1
No new rolls allowed by end of this season
League begin contracting based of number of players and continue to do so until mass retirements
Dont bring in flash replays here
no more sim changes *(will encourage migration)

Beta Server 2
Archetype Server
New rolls and teams begin here Season 1using new replays, rules, builds.
Sim updates and fundamental system changes happen here moving forward

It's not a terrible idea but more something that should be looked at when we come out of Beta (which believe it or not is going to happen sometime, some of these changes are geared with that in mind).
 
turnit643
offline
Link
 
The thread is still open, but there haven't been many Admin posts recently. This is updated through page 122, with this quote from Catch on page 118 ...

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by Hanz

I really don't think the 2 above recent statements issued work well together.

Your up in the top leagues..but just can't hack it anymore. The teams decides to start all over again. Since you are doing that, you know you will be losing all you funds saved and starting with a new staduim.

Now you have quite a few players and you haven't been able to fully gear them out, since you weren't sure on what was happening. You are now about to cut these lv 64ish players to FA.

If you give them cash in Equipment fund to bring all their gear up to full spec (which would probably run the bank account dry), you now stand the chance of losing your team???

We can't take the funds down level with us, We can't give it to the players that have been patiently waiting for it.

How is that fair??? What is the point?


You can give money to players in your EQ fund if you are starting over if those players are not all going to one or two teams. If they are going to multiple teams that are not part of an organization, then by all means distribute the money freely. If they are going to one team or multiple teams that are part of a organization, that would be punishable action.
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.