I want to make a new player, but not sure what position to make. What do you think is the most fun to make?
mastahyee
offline
offline
SS-- always seem to be playmakers in GLB
CB-- can get a pretty good amount of action
LB-- a little bit of both imo
The great thing about CBs and LBs is that there's also a pretty good amount of demand for both of them, so you probably won't have too tough of a time finding a team.
CB-- can get a pretty good amount of action
LB-- a little bit of both imo
The great thing about CBs and LBs is that there's also a pretty good amount of demand for both of them, so you probably won't have too tough of a time finding a team.
Originally posted by mastahyee
SS-- always seem to be playmakers in GLB--Unless your DC just goes cover 2 all day
CB-- can get a pretty good amount of action--Fun playmakers, I love mine, but they just seem too easy to build, very prone to cookie cutterness
LB-- a little bit of both imo--Fund dots to watch+the most challenging to build in GLB
The great thing about CBs and LBs is that there's also a pretty good amount of demand for both of them, so you probably won't have too tough of a time finding a team.
My SS is in his low thirties and I still don't watch him play much, he's basically just a coverage waif at this point in his career though.
SS-- always seem to be playmakers in GLB--Unless your DC just goes cover 2 all day
CB-- can get a pretty good amount of action--Fun playmakers, I love mine, but they just seem too easy to build, very prone to cookie cutterness
LB-- a little bit of both imo--Fund dots to watch+the most challenging to build in GLB
The great thing about CBs and LBs is that there's also a pretty good amount of demand for both of them, so you probably won't have too tough of a time finding a team.
My SS is in his low thirties and I still don't watch him play much, he's basically just a coverage waif at this point in his career though.
Redrover
offline
offline
I'd say LB or a bull rushing DE... I had a strong safety and his productivity was inversely related to how well the team would do. If he had 12 tackles it meant we most likely lost, if he had 1 it meant we won.
tightspandex
offline
offline
CB's on D...easy to find a team, they're often in position to make big plays, and they're cheap. While it is easy to fall into a cookie cutter build, it's also very easy to play around with the build and end up with a solid player. Can also do KR/PR.
HB's on O...even if you don't start there is a good chance that you'll end up doing PR/KR. Either way, you generally get a lot of chances to make big and impressive plays.
HB's on O...even if you don't start there is a good chance that you'll end up doing PR/KR. Either way, you generally get a lot of chances to make big and impressive plays.
Edited by 7jack11 on Feb 17, 2010 13:41:27
BP
offline
offline
Funnest Positions..IMO
CB - Alot of action, fun to build
FS - Not alot of action, but you can built alot of different types that work.
HB - TON of action, not easy to build great ones but not hard to build good ones
Least Fun
WRs - They all behave just about the same and cost 300 Flex per level. Passing game and WR speed has been so messed with, owning a WR sucks
QB's - Again, they all act just about the same and there are only a couple of ways to build them effectively
LB's - SA's suck, they need to be good at everything so very very hard to build a "special" one and just not that fun to watch
CB - Alot of action, fun to build
FS - Not alot of action, but you can built alot of different types that work.
HB - TON of action, not easy to build great ones but not hard to build good ones
Least Fun
WRs - They all behave just about the same and cost 300 Flex per level. Passing game and WR speed has been so messed with, owning a WR sucks
QB's - Again, they all act just about the same and there are only a couple of ways to build them effectively
LB's - SA's suck, they need to be good at everything so very very hard to build a "special" one and just not that fun to watch
Djinnt
offline
offline
Originally posted by BP
LB's - SA's suck, they need to be good at everything so very very hard to build a "special" one and just not that fun to watch
LB is fun because it's a little harder.
But it's really not that hard.
LB's - SA's suck, they need to be good at everything so very very hard to build a "special" one and just not that fun to watch
LB is fun because it's a little harder.
But it's really not that hard.
BP
offline
offline
Originally posted by Djinnt
Originally posted by BP
LB's - SA's suck, they need to be good at everything so very very hard to build a "special" one and just not that fun to watch
LB is fun because it's a little harder.
But it's really not that hard.
I've built some LB's and just didn't like it. It'll probably be better with the Archetypes...so you can really specialize them.
Originally posted by BP
LB's - SA's suck, they need to be good at everything so very very hard to build a "special" one and just not that fun to watch
LB is fun because it's a little harder.
But it's really not that hard.
I've built some LB's and just didn't like it. It'll probably be better with the Archetypes...so you can really specialize them.
King12
offline
offline
Originally posted by yojoe
Halfbacks are the way to go.
Running Backs are good, but theres just so many of them with Low demand. If you make an RB you have to be a booster or an SSBer. It just to hard to get steady work from what I have seen.
I like Fullbacks, theres always a high demand and getting a starting gig is easy. Plus I love watching my guy knock LBs down.
Halfbacks are the way to go.
Running Backs are good, but theres just so many of them with Low demand. If you make an RB you have to be a booster or an SSBer. It just to hard to get steady work from what I have seen.
I like Fullbacks, theres always a high demand and getting a starting gig is easy. Plus I love watching my guy knock LBs down.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
