Great Idea, just go with the roster limitation if you're pitching it. I'd definately be in for this if it went through.
Everyone gets OOP, so pick your poison. Don't change a thing.
Everyone gets OOP, so pick your poison. Don't change a thing.
robinhoodnik
offline
offline
Originally posted by haole
Originally posted by dmfa41
I say keep the OoPP but limit the number of players and add a script to make sure that each player is on the 2-deep at any given position.
Energy tactics could be exploited to keep the offensive players on offense and defensive players on defense if the team has enough players, so that's why we'd need those controls.
If you limit the entire roster to 15 players, you don't need to worry about energy tactics or exploits.
Even in an Iron Man league, you could still have a couple of players that are just offense and a couple that are just defense. Maybe a guy who's just kicker/punter. It would be up to each owner/GM to figure out how to best fill those 15 slots.
You could just have anybody do it if they have the skill. Jim Brown was a punter in college.
Originally posted by dmfa41
I say keep the OoPP but limit the number of players and add a script to make sure that each player is on the 2-deep at any given position.
Energy tactics could be exploited to keep the offensive players on offense and defensive players on defense if the team has enough players, so that's why we'd need those controls.
If you limit the entire roster to 15 players, you don't need to worry about energy tactics or exploits.
Even in an Iron Man league, you could still have a couple of players that are just offense and a couple that are just defense. Maybe a guy who's just kicker/punter. It would be up to each owner/GM to figure out how to best fill those 15 slots.
You could just have anybody do it if they have the skill. Jim Brown was a punter in college.
robinhoodnik
offline
offline
I do know for certain that I'd be building a few new players for this if it flies.
supgreg
offline
offline
This would be very simple to implement. Remove the OOP and and add tackling to your WRs, HBs, TEs and O-lineman.
Done.
No thanks.
Done.
No thanks.
greengoose
offline
offline
Actually, I'd probably retire a lot of my guys if this flies and remake them as Ironman players. Players in this game would actually play, not be hoarded and rotated like they are in the main game.
People make players to play, and an Ironman format ensures that is exactly what they'd be doing - playing, and not 20 plays a game either.
People make players to play, and an Ironman format ensures that is exactly what they'd be doing - playing, and not 20 plays a game either.
supgreg
offline
offline
Originally posted by greengoose
Actually, I'd probably retire a lot of my guys if this flies and remake them as Ironman players. Players in this game would actually play, not be hoarded and rotated like they are in the main game.
People make players to play, and an Ironman format ensures that is exactly what they'd be doing - playing, and not 20 plays a game either.
That is the only thing that makes any kind of sense as far as this idea goes.
Actually, I'd probably retire a lot of my guys if this flies and remake them as Ironman players. Players in this game would actually play, not be hoarded and rotated like they are in the main game.
People make players to play, and an Ironman format ensures that is exactly what they'd be doing - playing, and not 20 plays a game either.
That is the only thing that makes any kind of sense as far as this idea goes.
Cmfix64
offline
offline
Originally posted by supgreg
Originally posted by greengoose
Actually, I'd probably retire a lot of my guys if this flies and remake them as Ironman players. Players in this game would actually play, not be hoarded and rotated like they are in the main game.
People make players to play, and an Ironman format ensures that is exactly what they'd be doing - playing, and not 20 plays a game either.
That is the only thing that makes any kind of sense as far as this idea goes.
lol why because you dont like it? simply reduce the roster size and voila you have this league... should be fairly simple to implement and lots of fun
Originally posted by greengoose
Actually, I'd probably retire a lot of my guys if this flies and remake them as Ironman players. Players in this game would actually play, not be hoarded and rotated like they are in the main game.
People make players to play, and an Ironman format ensures that is exactly what they'd be doing - playing, and not 20 plays a game either.
That is the only thing that makes any kind of sense as far as this idea goes.
lol why because you dont like it? simply reduce the roster size and voila you have this league... should be fairly simple to implement and lots of fun
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Originally posted by Daily
Originally posted by dmfa41
Sounds fun!
Seems like a coding task, though.
It wouldn't be coding problem to create leagues IDENTICAL to the ones we already have with the ONLY difference being a 15 player roster limit. Viola! Iron Man leagues.
Originally posted by dmfa41
Sounds fun!
Seems like a coding task, though.
It wouldn't be coding problem to create leagues IDENTICAL to the ones we already have with the ONLY difference being a 15 player roster limit. Viola! Iron Man leagues.
supgreg
offline
offline
Originally posted by Daily
Originally posted by dmfa41
Sounds fun!
Seems like a coding task, though.
No, not a coding task, just eliminate the OOP. I already covered it.
Originally posted by dmfa41
Sounds fun!
Seems like a coding task, though.
No, not a coding task, just eliminate the OOP. I already covered it.
MVCoach91
offline
offline
sounds interesting... only 2 observations
1. I dont think everyone should have to play O and D, if a team wants to sign a traditional QB and just have him play QB, that is a strategy (they do that in arena)
2. Wouldnt everyone go an all running team eliminating the need for QBs WR or a receiving TE.... itd be like a peewee all run all I-Slam fest
1. I dont think everyone should have to play O and D, if a team wants to sign a traditional QB and just have him play QB, that is a strategy (they do that in arena)
2. Wouldnt everyone go an all running team eliminating the need for QBs WR or a receiving TE.... itd be like a peewee all run all I-Slam fest
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
