Warrior General Games

Top 9 teams only, ties ommitted, after 8 games:

0.673 Emerald City
0.600 Newcastle
0.509 Canberra
0.491 Fiji
0.482 Brisbane
0.473 New England
0.426 Carabao
0.389 Auckland
0.345 Sydney

Edited to appease the statistical gods, not that it changed a whole lot.

This says that us Flying Monkeys have played teams that have won almost a full game more than the team with the next strongest schedule in the league.

Alpha confrence, you've been warned!

This doesn't really mean anything unless you take out the games that the team in question played against its opponents. For example, of course New England, Brisbane, and Carabao are going to have opponents with low winning percentages. Why? Because we keep beating the teams that we play. Just to take Brisbane as an example, the only proper way to do it would be to weight how teams that Brisbane played in the games where they didn't play Brisbane.

Originally posted by BradyFTW
This doesn't really mean anything unless you take out the games that the team in question played against its opponents. For example, of course New England, Brisbane, and Carabao are going to have opponents with low winning percentages. Why? Because we keep beating the teams that we play. Just to take Brisbane as an example, the only proper way to do it would be to weight how teams that Brisbane played in the games where they didn't play Brisbane.

Ding! Ding! We have a winner. That is how you determine a true strength of schedule.

I will update

Much better, doesn't change it a ton, but it is statistically accurate now. If you really want me to get nerdy in here, I can break out a chi-squared table and start getting the confidence levels on those numbers too...

Beat me to it