Originally posted by THE PWNER
I agree that its too much to do it on the oline and even the FS. But i do think adding it for just the SS would be realistic. Lots of real teams switch between cover 1 and cover 2 regularly based on situations and that oftwn means bringing in a different SS.
An DE is a no-brainer, shocked we dont have i yet...
I agree with the DE. However, I don't pay enough attention to personnel swaps to notice whether or not a team swaps out their SS in different coverages.
Generally speaking, I see the SS being pulled off the field in favor of a CB or LB, but that's a completely different defensive package. Generally, the SS either drops back in coverage, or comes up on the line. All depends on defensive scheme and player abilities.
I agree that its too much to do it on the oline and even the FS. But i do think adding it for just the SS would be realistic. Lots of real teams switch between cover 1 and cover 2 regularly based on situations and that oftwn means bringing in a different SS.
An DE is a no-brainer, shocked we dont have i yet...
I agree with the DE. However, I don't pay enough attention to personnel swaps to notice whether or not a team swaps out their SS in different coverages.
Generally speaking, I see the SS being pulled off the field in favor of a CB or LB, but that's a completely different defensive package. Generally, the SS either drops back in coverage, or comes up on the line. All depends on defensive scheme and player abilities.